<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">filnauki</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Филологические науки в МГИМО</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MGIMO Journal of Language Research and Teaching</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2410-2423</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-3717</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО МИД России</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2410-2423-2022-3-32-70-81</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">filnauki-428</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Социолингвистика и геолингвистика</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SOCIOLINGUISTICS AND GEOLINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Англоязычный дискурс ООН: особенности и практическое применение в описании современного миропорядка</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>UN English-language discourse: pecularities and applications in describing the world order</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-8195</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Брицына</surname><given-names>Н. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Britsyna</surname><given-names>N. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Настасья Михайловна Брицына – преподаватель кафедры английского языка №3 </p><p>119454, Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nastasia Britsyna is Lecturer at Department of English No. 3 </p><p>76, Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nast.britsyna@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Брицына Н.М., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Брицына Н.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Britsyna N.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://philnauki.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/428">https://philnauki.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/428</self-uri><abstract><p>Настоящее исследование вписывается в контекст возросшего интереса к глобализации и её проявлению в современном англоязычном дискурсе. Избрание дискурса ООН объектом исследования обусловлено важным статусом данной организации в выявлении, формировании и распространении мировых тенденций. Автор исходит из того, что с помощью концептуального и когнитивно-семантического анализа англоязычного дискурса ООН становится возможным углубить понимание современной западной картины мира, которая из анализируемого дискурса распространяется и в другие типы дискурса с массовым реципиентом (медийный, образовательный и др.). Применение теории концептуальной метафоры позволило автору помимо понятийного уровня актуальных концептов более комплексно исследовать также образный и ценностный уровни для выявления различных лингвокогнитивных языковых средств, при помощи которых конструируется модель миропорядка и даётся оценка действительности. Исследование показало, что языковое поведение участников дискурса можно описать дихотомией «объединение – сегментация». С одной стороны, коммуниканты репрезентируют действительность как поле жизни «семьи» (на основе концептуальной метафоры THE WORLD IS A FAMILY («Мир есть семья»)) с присущими семье ценностями и обязательствами; с другой – подвергают мир ярко выраженной категоризации посредством концептуального противопоставления СВОЙ vs. ЧУЖОЙ и концептуально-метафорической модели “The fairy tale of the just war”(«Легенда о войне за правое дело»). Выявлены также лингвистические механизмы иерархизации отношений участников при помощи концептуальных метафор RELATIONS AMONG STATES ARE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS («Отношения между государствами – это отношения родителя и ребёнка») и LEADER STATE IS A NURTURANT PARENT («Государство-лидер есть заботливый родитель»). Результаты работы могут быть полезны для дальнейших исследований современного англоязычного дискурса в когнитивно-прагматическом ключе, с возможностью использования выявленных концептуальных метафор для обнаружения речевых тактик и стратегий, а также для сравнительного анализа конструируемой англоязычной картины мира с языковыми моделями, которые репрезентируют другие официальные языки ООН: русский, французский, испанский, китайский, арабский.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This research paper is set in the context of growing interest towards globalization and its effects on contemporary English-language discourse. The focus on the United Nations’ discourse can be explained by the pivotal role of this organization in identifying, shaping and spreading global trends. The underlying assumption is that conceptual, cognitive and semantic analyses of the English-language UN discourse enable deeper understanding of the western worldview, which expands into other types of discourse with a broad audience (media, educational, etc). The application of the conceptual metaphor theory has allowed to discover a conceptual-definitional level as well as image and value levels of the employed concepts in order to find out cognitive linguistic tools which construct the world order model and the view of today’s reality. The study has shown that the language behaviour can be described with the dichotomy “uniting – separating”. On the one hand, reality is represented as a “family” field of life (based on the conceptual metaphor THE WORLD IS A FAMILY) with inherent family values and obligations. On the other hand, the world is subject to explicit categorization through the conceptual opposition of FRIEND vs. FOE and the conceptual and metaphorical model of “The fairy tale of the just war”. Mechanisms of linguistic hierarchization of participants’ relations were also revealed with the help of conceptual metaphors RELATIONS AMONG STATES ARE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS and LEADER STATE IS A NURTURANT PARENT. The results of the study may be useful for further research on contemporary English-language discourse in a cognitive-pragmatic way, with the possibility of using the identified conceptual metaphors to detect speech tactics and strategies, as well as for comparative analysis of the constructed English-language world view with language models represented by other official UN languages: Russian, French, Spanish, Chinese and Arabic.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>английский язык</kwd><kwd>концептуальная метафора</kwd><kwd>дискурс ООН</kwd><kwd>дискурс международных организаций</kwd><kwd>общественно-политический дискурс</kwd><kwd>когнитивная лингвистика</kwd><kwd>дискурсанализ</kwd><kwd>семантический анализ</kwd><kwd>метафорический концепт</kwd><kwd>концепт</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>English language</kwd><kwd>conceptual metaphor</kwd><kwd>UN discourse</kwd><kwd>discourse of international organizations</kwd><kwd>political discourse</kwd><kwd>cognitive linguistics</kwd><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>semantic analysis</kwd><kwd>metaphoric concept</kwd><kwd>concept</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Архипов И.К. Когнитивные структуры знания и средства их выражения в языке // Когнитивные исследования языка, 2008, №3. С. 158–168.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arkhipov, I. Kognitivnye struktury znaniia i sredstva ikh vyrazheniia v iazyke [Cognitive structures of knowledge and methods of their expression in language]. Cognitive Studies of Language, 2008, 3. P. 158–168.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград: Перемена, 2002. 476 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karasik, V. Iazykovoi Krug: Lichnost’, Kontsepty, Diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 476 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ковалев Н.А. Эволюция концепта COLD WAR в американском политическом дискурсе (на материалах СМИ). Дисс. … канд. филол. наук. М.: МГИМО, 2020. 173 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kovalev, N. Evoliutsiia Kontsepta COLD WAR v Amerikanskom Politicheskom Diskurse (na Materialakh SMI) [Evolution of COLD WAR Concept in American Political Discourse (Based on Media Materials)]. MGIMO University, 2020. 173 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новиков Д.Н. Концептуализация системы морали в современном англоязычном политическом дискурсе в контексте феномена глобализации (на материале выступлений в Организации Объединённых Наций) / Д. Н. Новиков, Н. М. Брицына // Филологические науки в МГИМО, 2020, №3 (23). С. 33–41. DOI: 10.24833/2410-2423-2020-3-23-33-41</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov, D., &amp; Britsyna, N. Kontsеptualizatsiia sistemy morali v sovremennom angloiazychnom politicheskom diskurse v kontekste fenomena globalizatsii (na materiale vystupleniy v Organizatsii Obyedinennykh Natsiy). [The conceptualization of morality in modern English-language globalization discourse: evidence from the United Nations speeches]. Linguistics &amp; Polyglot Studies, 2020, 3 (23). P. 33–41. DOI: 10.24833/2410-2423-2020-3-23-33-41</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Слышкин Г.Г. От текста к символу: лингвокультурные концепты прецедентных текстов в сознании и дискурсе. М.: Academia, 2000. 128 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Slyshkin G. Ot Teksta k Simvolu: Lingvokulturnye Kontsepty Pretsedentnych Tekstov v Soznanii i Diskurse. [From Text to Symbol: Linguistic-Cultural Concepts of Precedent Texts in the Minds and Discourse]. Moscow: Academia, 2000. 128 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чес Н.А. Концептуальная метафора как средство конструирования политической реальности в современном медиадискурсе // Язык, сознание, коммуникация: сборник статей / Отв. ред. серии В. В. Красных, А. И. Изотов. Вып. 57. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2017. С. 271–282.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ches, N. Kontseptual’naia metafora kak sredstvo konstruirovaniia politicheskoi real’nosti v sovremennom mediadiskurse. [Media discourse analysis: how conceptual metaphors construct political reality]. Yazyk, Soznanie, Kommunikatsiia: Sbornik Statei [Language, Cognition, Communication: Collected Works] (V. Krasnych &amp; А. Izotov series eds. in chief). Vol. 57. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2017. P. 271–282.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fact Sheet: President Biden and G7 Leaders Launch Build Back Better World (B3W) Partnership. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/12/fact-sheet-president-biden-and-g7-leaders-launch-build-back-better-world-b3w-partnership/ (дата обращения 23.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fact Sheet: President Biden and G7 Leaders Launch Build Back Better World (B3W) Partnership, whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/12/fact-sheet-president-biden-and-g7-leaders-launch-build-back-better-world-b3wpartnership/ (accessed 23 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fillmore, Ch. Frames and the semantics of understanding // Quaderni di Semantica, 1985, 6 (2). P. 222–254.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fillmore, Ch. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 1985, 6 (2). P. 222–254.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ghafele, R. The metaphors of globalization and trade. Аn analysis of the language used in the World Trade Organization. Vienna University, 2004. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37736/ (дата обращения 21.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ghafele, R. The metaphors of globalization and trade. Аn analysis of the language used in the World Trade Organization. Vienna University, 2004, mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37736/ (accessed 21 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakoff, G., Johnson, G. Conceptual metaphor in everyday language // The Journal of Philosophy, 1980, vol. 77, no. 8. P. 453– 486.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakoff, G., &amp; Johnson, G. Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 1980, vol. 77, no. 8. P. 453– 486.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakoff, G. Metaphor and war: the metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf // Peace Research, 1991, 23. P. 25–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakoff, G. Metaphor and war: the metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research, 1991, 23. P. 25–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakoff, G. Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust // Social Research, 1995, vol. 62, no. 2. URL: http://www.wwcd.org/issues/Lakoff.html (дата обращения 21.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakoff, G. Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Research, 1995, vol. 62, no. 2, wwcd.org/issues/Lakoff.html (accessed 21 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Merriam Webster, 2022. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com (дата обращения 23.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Merriam Webster, 2022, merriam-webster.com (accessed 23 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, 2022. URL: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ (дата обращения 23.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, 2022, oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ (accessed 23 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rebirthing the Global Economy to deliver Sustainable Development. URL: https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/building-back-better-requires-transforming-development-model-latin-america-and-caribbean (дата обращения 22.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rebirthing the Global Economy to deliver Sustainable Development, un.org/en/coronavirus/building-back-better-requires-transforming-development-model-latin-america-and-caribbean (accessed 22 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steering Committee on Partnerships for Small Island Developing States (at the ambassadorial level). URL: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1y/k1yu3lnsgo (дата обращения 23.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Steering Committee on Partnerships for Small Island Developing States (at the ambassadorial level), media.un.org/en/asset/ k1y/k1yu3lnsgo (accessed 23 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Strengthening multilateralism “only way” to peaceful world for all: Guterres. URL: https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/07/1122212 (дата обращения 22.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Strengthening multilateralism “only way” to peaceful world for all: Guterres, news.un.org/en/story/2022/07/1122212 (accessed 22 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (дата обращения 29.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed 29 June 2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">United Nations Secretary-General’s Report “Our Common Agenda”. URL: https://www.un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/ (дата обращения 29.06.2022)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">United Nations Secretary-General’s Report “Our Common Agenda”, un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/ (accessed 29 June 2022)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
