<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">filnauki</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Филологические науки в МГИМО</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MGIMO Journal of Language Research and Teaching</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2410-2423</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-3717</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО МИД России</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2410-2423-2025-4-45-94-106</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">filnauki-658</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>LINGUISTICS AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Образ винтика: предварительный анализ метафоры механизма через призму теории концептуальной интеграции</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Image of a Cog: Preliminary Analysis of the Mechanism Metaphor Through the Conceptual Integration Theory</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8996-8882</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Уразаев</surname><given-names>М. Д.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Urazaev</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Марат Дамирович Уразаев, кандидат филологических наук, старший преподаватель</p><p>кафедра иностранных языков гуманитарных факультетов</p><p>450076; ул. Заки Валиди д. 32; Уфа</p><p>Сфера научных и профессиональных интересов: когнитивная лингвистика, семасиология, языковая типология</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Marat D. Urazaev, PhD, Senior Lecturer</p><p>Department of Foreign Languages for Humanities Faculties</p><p>450076; 32, Zaki Validi str.; Ufa</p><p>Areas of scientific and professional interests: cognitive linguistics, semasiology, linguistic typology</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">marat-urazaev@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Уфимский университет науки и технологий<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Ufa University of Science of Technology<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>94</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Уразаев М.Д., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Уразаев М.Д.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Urazaev M.D.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://philnauki.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/658">https://philnauki.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/658</self-uri><abstract><p>   В данном исследовании рассматривается метафора механизма с особым вниманием к её субординатной форме − винтику – и анализируется, как этот образ концептуализирует роли и функции в рамках сложных абстрактных систем. В то время как предыдущие исследования в основном опирались на теорию концептуальной метафоры, настоящая работа предлагает комбинированный подход, объединяющий теорию концептуальной метафоры и теорию концептуальной интеграции, что позволяет выявлять новые смысловые структуры, не объяснимые прямыми метафорическими проекциями между областью-источником и областью-целью. Такой подход обеспечивает более динамичную модель взаимодействия механических и абстрактных ментальных пространств при порождении интегрированных метафорических структур. Эмпирическая база исследования основана на корпусных данных из Corpus of Contemporary American English и Национального корпуса русского языка, включая двадцать репрезентативных примеров из различных дискурсов. Анализ показывает, что суперординатная метафора «система − это механизм» широко распространена в обоих языках, тогда как субординатная метафора «человек − это винтик» преобладает в примерах, описывающих институциональные, политические и культурные системы. Однако различается коннотативная оценка: в английских примерах винтики часто концептуализируются как кооперативные или незаменимые элементы, способствующие эффективности системы, тогда как в русском дискурсе метафора нередко акцентирует обезличивание, идеологический контроль и функциональную заменимость. Результаты анализа указывают на адаптивность механических метафор и подтверждают потенциал теории концептуальной интеграции для выявления новых смысловых структур. Порождение таких структур, как утрата индивидуальности, функциональная предопределённость и даже незаменимость как предмет гордости, невозможно объяснить только простыми метафорическими проекциями в рамках теории концептуальной метафоры. Полученные результаты вносят вклад в когнитивную лингвистику, теорию метафоры и исследование дискурса, показывая, как механические образы формируют концептуализацию ролей, иерархий и системных отношений в абстрактных структурах.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>   This study explores the metaphor of the mechanism, focusing particularly on its subordinate sub-metaphor of the cog and examining how this image conceptualizes roles and functions within complex systems. While earlier research has primarily applied Conceptual Metaphor Theory, this paper introduces a combined approach that integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with Conceptual Integration Theory to reveal emergent meanings that cannot be explained by direct source–target mappings. This approach provides a more dynamic model of how mechanical and abstract input spaces interact to generate blended metaphorical structures. The empirical basis consists of corpus data drawn from the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the Russian National Corpus, including twenty representative examples from diverse discourses. The analysis shows that the superordinate metaphor “a system is a mechanism” is pervasive in both languages, while the subordinate metaphor “an individual is a cog” dominates across institutional, political, and cultural contexts. However, evaluation patterns diverge: English examples often frame cogs as cooperative or indispensable elements contributing to systemic efficiency, whereas Russian discourse frequently foregrounds depersonalization, ideological control, and functional replaceability. The findings demonstrate the adaptability of mechanistic metaphors and confirm the explanatory potential of Conceptual Integration Theory for identifying emergent meanings. These meanings − such as the loss of individuality, functional determinism, and even pride in indispensability could not be fully analyzed by simple domain mapping as proposed by Conceptual Metaphor theory alone. The results contribute to cognitive linguistics, metaphor theory, and discourse studies, offering insights into how mechanical imagery shapes conceptualizations of agency, hierarchy, and systemic order in abstract frameworks.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>метафора механизма</kwd><kwd>теория концептуальной интеграции</kwd><kwd>концептуальная метафора</kwd><kwd>метафора винтика</kwd><kwd>концептуальное смешение</kwd><kwd>межпонятийная проекция</kwd><kwd>корпусный анализ</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>mechanism metaphor</kwd><kwd>conceptual integration theory</kwd><kwd>conceptual metaphor</kwd><kwd>cog metaphor</kwd><kwd>conceptual blending</kwd><kwd>cross-domain mapping</kwd><kwd>corpus-based analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baryshnikov P.N. Mind as Machine: The Influence of Mechanism on the Conceptual Foundations of the Computer Metaphor // RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2022. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 755–769. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-4-755-769.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baryshnikov, P. “Mind as Machine: The Influence of Mechanism on the Conceptual Foundations of the Computer Metaphor.” RUDN Journal of Philosophy, vol. 26, no. 4, 2022, pp. 755–769. doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-4-755-769.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baryshnikov P. Body and Mind through the Lens of Mechanistic Metaphors: A History of Semantic Aberrations // Technology and Language. 2023. Vol. 4(4). P. 7–21. DOI: 10.48417/technolang.2023.04.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baryshnikov, P. “Body and Mind through the Lens of Mechanistic Metaphors: A History of Semantic Aberrations.” Technology and Language, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, pp. 7–21. doi: 10.48417/technolang.2023.04.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barwich A.-S. Rage against the what? The machine metaphor in biology / A.-S. Barwich, M.J. Rodriguez // Biology &amp; Philosophy. 2024. Vol. 39. Article 14. DOI: 10.1007/s10539-024-09950-4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barwich, A.-S., and M.J. Rodriguez. “Rage against the What? The Machine Metaphor in Biology.” Biology &amp; Philosophy, vol. 39, no. 14, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10539-024-09950-4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bongard J. Living Things Are Not (20&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Century) Machines: Updating Mechanism Metaphors in Light of the Modern Science of Machine Behavior / J. Bongard, M. Levin // Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2021. Vol. 9. Article 650726. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.650726.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bongard, J., and M. Levin. “Living Things Are Not (20&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Century) Machines: Updating Mechanism Metaphors in Light of the Modern Science of Machine Behavior.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 9, 2021, article 650726. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.650726.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brandt L. Making Sense of a Blend. A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Metaphor / L. Brandt, P.A. Brandt // Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 2005. Vol. 3. P. 216–249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brandt, L., and P.A. Brandt. “Making Sense of a Blend: A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Metaphor.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, vol. 3, John Benjamins, 2005, pp. 216–249.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colston H.L. Metaphor in the Mirror // Metaphor and Symbol. 2025. Vol. 40(3). P. 181–188. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2025.2521903.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colston, H.L. “Metaphor in the Mirror.” Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 40, no. 3, 2025, pp. 181–188. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2025.2521903.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fauconnier G. Conceptual integration networks / G. Fauconnier, M. Turner // Cognitive Science. 1998. Vol. 22(2). P. 133–187. DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. “Conceptual Integration Networks.” Cognitive Science, vol. 22, no. 2, 1998, pp. 133–187. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gantt E.E. Once More into the Breach: Revisiting the Metaphor of Mechanism in Evolutionary Psychological Explanations / E.E. Gantt, J.L. Thayne // Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology. 2012. Vol. 4(1). P. 46–53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gantt, E. E., and J.L. Thayne. “Once More into the Breach: Revisiting the Metaphor of Mechanism in Evolutionary Psychological Explanations.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012, pp. 46–53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глебкин В.В. Метафора механизма и теория концептуальной метафоры Лакоффа – Джонсона // Вопросы языкознания. 2012. № 3. С. 51–68. DOI: 10.31857/SX0000392-4-1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glebkin, V. “Metafora mekhanizma i teoriia kontseptual’noi metafory Lakoffa–Dzhonsona” (The Metaphor of Mechanism and Lakoff–Johnson’s Conceptual Metaphor Theory). Voprosy iazykoznaniia (Topics in the Study of Language), no. 3, 2012, pp. 51–68. doi: 10.31857/SX0000392-4-1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grady J.E. Blending and metaphor / J.E. Grady, T. Oakley, S. Coulson // In: Steen G., Gibbs R. (eds.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. P. 101–124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grady, J. E. et al. “Blending and Metaphor.” Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by G. Steen and R. Gibbs, J. Benjamins, 1999, pp. 101–124.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wilson J. The Ghost in the Machine: Metaphors of the ‘Virtual’ and the ‘Artificial’ in Post-WW2 Computer Science // Perspectives on Science. 2024. Vol. 32(3). P. 372–393. DOI: 10.1162/posc_a_00611.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wilson, J. “The Ghost in the Machine: Metaphors of the ‘Virtual’ and the ‘Artificial’ in Post-WW2 Computer Science.” Perspectives on Science, vol. 32, no. 3, 2024, pp. 372–393. doi: 10.1162/posc_a_00611.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kotsakis A. Beyond the machinery metaphors: Towards a theory of international organizations as machines // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2024. Vol. 37. P. 608–629. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156524000153.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kotsakis, A. “Beyond the Machinery Metaphors: Towards a Theory of International Organizations as Machines.” Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 37, 2024, pp. 608–629. doi: 10.1017/S0922156524000153.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kövecses Z. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 220 p. DOI: 10.1017/9781108859127.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kövecses, Z. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge UP, 2020. doi: 10.1017/9781108859127.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakoff G. Metaphors We Live By / G. Lakoff, M. Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lapka O. Machine metaphors in 2020 USA electioneering campaign: a cognitive aspect // Studies about Languages / Kalbų studijos. 2023. No. 43. P. 64–76. DOI: 10.5755/j01.sal.1.43.35102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lapka, O. “Machine Metaphors in 2020 USA Electioneering Campaign: A Cognitive Aspect.” Studies about Languages / Kalbų Studijos, vol. 43, 2023, pp. 64–76. doi: 10.5755/j01.sal.1.43.35102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mácha J. Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Classical Theory: Affinities Rather than Divergences / J. Mácha // In: Stalmaszczyk P. (ed.). From Philosophy of Fiction to Cognitive Poetics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2016. P. 93–115. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-653-06564-0.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mácha, J. “Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Classical Theory: Affinities Rather than Divergences.” From Philosophy of Fiction to Cognitive Poetics, edited by Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 93–115. doi: 10.3726/978-3-653-06564-0.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malkomsen A. Digging down or scratching the surface: how patients use metaphors to describe their experiences of psychotherapy / A. Malkomsen, J.I. Røssberg, T. Dammen, T. Wilberg, A. Løvgren, R. Ulberg, J. Evensen // BMC Psychiatry. 2021. Vol. 21(1). Article 533. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03551-1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malkomsen, A., et al. “Digging Down or Scratching the Surface: How Patients Use Metaphors to Describe Their Experiences of Psychotherapy.” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 21, no. 533, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03551-1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McKenzie S.K. Understanding Men’s Lived Experience of Mental Distress Through Metaphors / S.K. McKenzie, F. Mathieson, T. Das, M.C. Genuchi, J.L. Oliffe // American Journal of Men’s Health. 2024. Vol. 18(3). Article 15579883241260920. DOI: 10.1177/15579883241260920.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McKenzie, S. K., et al. “Understanding Men’s Lived Experience of Mental Distress through Metaphors.” American Journal of Men’s Health, vol. 18, no. 3, 2024, article 15579883241260920. doi: 10.1177/15579883241260920.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mokyr J. “The Holy Land of Industrialism”: rethinking the Industrial Revolution // Journal of the British Academy. 2021. Vol. 9. P. 223–247. DOI: 10.5871/jba/009.223.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mokyr, J. “‘The Holy Land of Industrialism’: Rethinking the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of the British Academy, vol. 9, 2021, pp. 223–247. doi: 10.5871/jba/009.223.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Плужникова Н.Н. Техника: метафоры «машины» и «механизма» в истории философской мысли / Н.Н. Плужникова, Н.Р. Саенко // Философия и культура. 2024. № 10. С. 51–60. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2024.10.72077.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pozdnyakov, A. “Metafora mekhanizma v nekotorykh evoliutsionnykh kontseptsiiakh” (The Metaphor of Mechanism in Some Evolutionary Concepts). Filosofiia nauki (Philosophy of Science), no. 2 (61), 2014, pp. 81–94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поздняков А.А. Метафора механизма в некоторых эволюционных концепциях // Философия науки. 2014. № 2(61). С. 81–94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pluzhnikova, N., and N. Saenko. “Tekhnika: metafory ‘mashiny’ i ‘mekhanizma’ v istorii filosofskoi mysli” (Technology: Metaphors of the ‘Machine’ and ‘Mechanism’ in the History of Philosophical Thought). Filosofiya i kul’tura (Philosophy and Culture), no. 10, 2024, pp. 51–60. doi: 10.7256/2454-0757.2024.10.72077.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ruse M. Evolution and ethics viewed from within two metaphors: machine and organism // HPLS. 2022. Vol. 44. Article 1. DOI: 10.1007/s40656-022-00482-2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ruse, M. “Evolution and Ethics Viewed from within Two Metaphors: Machine and Organism.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, vol. 44, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s40656-022-00482-2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Lith T. Visual narratives as evidence: Surveying the role of metaphors in art therapy / T. Van Lith, E. Cornwall, N. Gerber, H. He, M. Centracchio // The Arts in Psychotherapy. 2025. Vol. 94. Article 102296. DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2025.102296.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Lith, T., et al. “Visual Narratives as Evidence: Surveying the Role of Metaphors in Art Therapy.” The Arts in Psychotherapy, vol. 94, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2025.102296.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu H. Nature Vs. Nurture: Is the Origin of Logic Innate or Acquired // Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2024. Vol. 88. P. 236–242. DOI: 10.54097/ztn68w96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu, Haolin. “Nature Vs. Nurture: Is the Origin of Logic Innate or Acquired.” Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 88, 2024, pp. 236–242. Doi: 10.54097/ztn68w96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zwir I. Evolution of genetic networks for human creativity / I. Zwir, C. Del-Val, M. Hintsanen, K.M. Cloninger, R. Romero-Zaliz, A. Mesa, J. Arnedo, R. Salas, G.F. Poblete, E. Raitoharju, O. Raitakari, L. Keltikangas-Järvinen, G.A. de Erausquin, I. Tattersall, T. Lehtimäki, C.R. Cloninger // Molecular Psychiatry. 2022. Vol. 27. P. 354–376. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01097-y.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zwir, I., et al. “Evolution of Genetic Networks for Human Creativity.” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 27, 2022, pp. 354–376. Doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01097-y.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
