COGNITIVE AND PRAGMATIC PARAMETERS OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR IN THE BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE
Abstract
About the Authors
O. A. EgorovaRussian Federation
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
Egorova Olga A. – PhD in Philology, The Senior Lecturer of English Language Department № 1.
V. V. Kalashnikova
Russian Federation
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
Kalashnikova Viktoria V. – Master’s course postgraduate student (Programme in Training interpreters and translators for international organizations).
References
1. Arutjunova N. D. Metafora i diskurs [Metaphor and Discourse] / Teorija metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. M.: Progress, 1990. P. 390.
2. Gak V. G. Metafora: universal’noe i specificheskoe [Metaphor: the Universal and specific] // Metafora v jazyke i tekste [Metaphor in Language and Text]. M., 1988, pp. 11-26.
3. Grachev G. V. Rol’ jazykovyh sredstv v formirovanii predstavlenij o terrorizme (na materiale sovremennogo anglijskogo jazyka) [The Role of Language Means in Shaping Representations of Terrorism in the English Language]: diss. … kand. filol. n. [PhD thesis in Linguistics] M., 2001. 250 p.
4. Druzhinin A. S. Towards a bio-cognitive understanding of grammar // Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 8-1 (62), pp. 110-112.
5. Druzhinin A. S. Modelirovanie «psevdoreal’nosti» v amerikanskom predvybornom diskurse posredstvom kontrafaktivnyh konstrukcij anglijskogo jazyka [Modeling ‘pseudoreality’ in American election discourse by means of English counterfactual grammatical constructions] // Nauchnoe mnenie: nauchnyj zhurnal [Scientific opinion: research journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 41-45.
6. Druzhinin A. S. Parametry pragmaticheskogo analiza predvybornogo diskursa [Parameters of pragmatic analysis of election discourse] // Jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal [Electronic Science Journal], 2016, no. 9, pp. 158-164. Available at: www.co2b.ru (Accessed 13.10.2016).
7. Egorova, O. A., Kalashnikova V. V. Teorija konceptual’noj metafory v kognitivnoj lingvistike [Theory of Conceptual Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics] // Jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal [Electronic Science Journal], 2016, no. 10. Available at: www.co2b.ru (Accessed 13.10.2016).
8. Krejdlin G. E. Metafora semanticheskih prostranstv i znachenie predloga [Metaphor of Semantic Space and Meaning of Preposition] // Voprosy jazykoznanija [Issues of Linguistics], 1994, no. 5, pp. 56-62.
9. Lakoff D., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by // Theory of metaphor. M., 1990. P. 387-415.
10. Pesina S. A., Druzhinin A. S. Kognitivnyj i antropocentricheskij podhod k processu kommunikacii [Cognitive and Anthropocentric Approach to Communication] // Vestnik Brjanskogo gosuniversiteta [Bryansk State University Bulletin], 2016, no. 3, pp. 161-166.
Review
For citations:
Egorova O.A., Kalashnikova V.V. COGNITIVE AND PRAGMATIC PARAMETERS OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR IN THE BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2016;(8):39-53. (In Russ.)