The conceptualization of morality in modern english-language globalization discourse: evidence from the United Nations Speeches
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2020-3-23-33-41
Abstract
The increased interest of international cognitive linguists in the mechanisms of conceptualizing modern social phenomena has necessitated cognitive linguistic analysis of such phenomena as globalization, which is one of the most important trends setting the vector for modern society development.
This study attempts not only to identify key concepts and means of their representation in terms of the globalization phenomenon, but also to build with the help of these concepts elements of the modern moral system inherent in the English-speaking community. To this end, a conceptual and cognitive-semantic analysis of contemporary English-language political discourse was carried out on the basis of speeches delivered by delegates to the United Nations.
The investigation is premised on the theory of conceptual metaphor, emphasizing the need to understand the metaphorical foundations of human consciousness and communication. The study collected and analyzed empirical data that can be used to draw conclusions about the models of representation and assessment of reality by members of the English-speaking community, which in turn opens up prospects for further research in a linguistic pragmatic way and studying the specific features of English-speakers’ view of the world.
As a result of lexicological and discourse-based analysis of speech transcripts, the paper uncovers several basic metaphorical models (Morality as 1. Commitment; 2. Nurturant Parent; 3. Resilience; 4. Fairy Tale of the Just War; 5. Progress), which outline globalization within the conceptual view of the world and which are underlined by such antitheses as “moral - immoral,” “success - loss,” “strength - weakness” etc.
About the Authors
D. N. Novikov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry N. Novikov − PhD in Linguistics, Associate Professor at English Language Department No. 1. Spheres of research and professional interest: cognitive linguistics, biosemantics, pragmatics, communication theory, theory of translation
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
N. M. Britsyna
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nastasia M. Britsyna − student of Master’s degree program on Training translators and interpreters for international organizations (“Theory and practice of simultaneous interpretation and translation”). Spheres of research and professional interest: cognitive linguistics, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, linguistic and cognitive creation and activation of a linguistic view of the world
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Alieva, T.V. Kontseptual’naia oppozitsiia “SVOI - ChUZhOI” v politicheskom diskurse Velikobritanii (Velikobritaniia − SShA) [Conceptual opposition “friend or foe” in UK political discourse (UK – USA)]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki. Filologiia [The Journal of Tambov state university]. 11 (67). Tambov, 2008. pp. 216 – 220.
2. Arkhipov, I. K. Kognitivnye struktury znaniia i sredstva ikh vyrazheniia v iazyke [Cognitive structures of knowledge and methods of their expression in language] // Kontseptualnyi analiz iazyka: sovremennye napravleniia issledovaniia [Conceptual Language Analysis: contemporary trends in research]. Мoscow: RAN, 2008. 159 p.
3. Kravchenko, A.V. Kognitivnyi gorizont iazykoznaniia [Cognitive horizons of linguistics]. Irkutsk: BGUEP, 2008. 148 p.
4. Kubriakova, E.S., Kratkii slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov [Brief Dictionary of cognitive terms] / E.S Kubriakova, V.Z. Dem’iankov, U.G. Pankrats // Мoscow: IPO Lev Tolstoi, 1996. 90 p.
5. Cambridge Learner’s Dictionary, 2019, dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/ (Accessed 24 November 2019)
6. Collins Online Dictionary, 2019, www.collinsdictionary.com/ (Accessed 24 November 2019)
7. Ghafele, R. The metaphors of globalization and trade. Аn analysis of the language used in the World Trade Organization // Vienna University, 2004, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37736/ (Accessed 21 November 2019)
8. Lakoff, G. Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals In the Dust // Social Research. 1995, vol. 62, no. 2, http://www.wwcd.org/issues/Lakoff.html (Accessed 21 November 2019)
9. Lakoff, G. Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf // Peace Research. 1991, 23. P. 25-32.
10. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 2019, www.ldoceonline.com/ (Accessed 24 November 2019)
11. Mapping Metaphor with the Historical Thesaurus // University of Glasgow, 2015, mappingmetaphor.arts.gla.ac.uk (Accessed 23 November 2019)
12. Dictionary by Merriam-Webster, 2019, www.merriam-webster.com/ (Accessed 24 November 2019)
13. Online Etymology Dictionary, 2019, www.etymonline.com/ (Accessed 24 November 2019)
14. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, 2019, www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ (Accessed 24 November 2019)
Review
For citations:
Novikov D.N., Britsyna N.M. The conceptualization of morality in modern english-language globalization discourse: evidence from the United Nations Speeches. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2020;23(3):33-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2020-3-23-33-41
Views:
601
Email this article 