COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERSIAN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH A COMPONENT OF BLACK AND WHITE COLORS AND THEIR RUSSIAN EQUIVALENTS
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2018-4-16-114-119
Abstract
In the Russian and Persian languages we can find stable combinations that have the same or similar meaning used in the same sphere. Such syntagmatically linked phrases must be compared when teaching Russian as a foreign language, since mastering the system of phraseological units should begin by introducing the correspondences that arise in different languages and cultures on the basis of the generality in the picture of the world.
In this article we examine semantics and the use of phraseological units with a component of black and white colors in the Persian and Russian languages that are an important part of the culture, significant for the construction of the national picture of the world.
A comparative analysis of the data suggests that there are similarities and differences between the Persian and Russian languages. Based on our analysis, we can divide phraseological units into 3 types, differing in degrees of similarity: 1) total equivalents: phraseological units having identical structure, figurative basis and semantics both in Persian and Russian; 2) partial equivalents: phraseological units with the same meaning both in Persian and Russian but with relatively different components and structure; 3) non-equivalent constructions: units that exist only in Persian and related to the worldview of the Iranian people.
About the Authors
M. Khademi Moghaddam
University of Tarbiat Modares
Islamic Republic of Iran
Islamic Republic of Iran
Tehran, Jalal Ale Ahmad Ave
Khademi Moghaddam M. – PhD (Philology), Tarbiat Modares University. Scope of scientific and professional interests: grammar of the Russian language, linguoculturology, political, economic and scientific translation.
M. Rezaei
University of Tarbiat Modares
Islamic Republic of Iran
Islamic Republic of Iran
Tehran, Jalal Ale Ahmad Ave
Rezaei M. – postgraduate student of the Russian language at Tarbiat Modares University. Scope of scientific and professional interests: literature of the Russian language, linguoculturology, economic and scientific translation.
References
1. Vinogradov V.V., Russky iazyk [Te Russian language], Moscow, 1972. 601p. (in Russian).
2. Golovin, B.N. Vvedenie v iazykoznanie [Introduction into linguistics]. M., 1977. 312p.
3. Kotyshova M.A. Frazeologicheskie edinitsy s komponentom-kolorativom “bely” v russkom i cheshskom iazykakh [Phraseological units with white colour component in Russian and Check] // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Teory and practice]. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 9(63): v 3-kh ch. ch. 3. p.112-113.
4. Markova E.M. Lingvokul’turnaia asimmetriia tsvetovykh oboznachenii v slavianskikh (russkom i cheshskom) iazykakh [Linguocultural asymmetry in colour designation in Slavic (Russian and Check) languages] // Russkii iazyk kak inoslavianskii [Russian as a foreign language]. Belgrad: Slavistichko drushtvo Srbije, 2013. Vyp. V. Sovremennoe izuchenie russkogo iazyka i russkoi kul’tury v inoslavianskom okruzhenii. p.17-24.
5. Markova E.M. Frazeologizmy s komponentom-kolorativom v slavianskikh iazykakh v aspekte otrazheniia ikh lingvokul’turnoi spetsifki [Phraseologisms with colour-component in Slavic languages in reflection their linguocultural specifcs] // Frazeologiia v mnogoiazychnom obshchestve: sbornik trudov Mezhdunarodnoi Frazeologicheskoi konferentsii «Europhraz» [Phraseology in multilingual society: collection of the articles “Europhraz”, Conference on Phraseology: v 2-kh t. Kazan’: izdvo «KhETER», 2013. p.281-288.
6. Maslova V.A. Vvedenie v lingvokul’turologiiu [Introduction in linguocultural studies]. M.: Nasledie, 1997. 208 p.
7. Smirnova M.A. Khudozhestvennyi obraz v grafcheskoi kompozitsii [Artistic image in a graphic composition] // Nauchnometodologicheskie i sotsial’nye aspekty psikhologii i pedagogiki [Scientifc methodological and social aspects of psychology and pedagogy]: sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 2016.p. 151-153.
8. Frazeologicheskii slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo iazyka [Phraseological dictionary of contemporary Russian] / pod red. A. N. Tikhonova; sost. A.N. Tikhonov, A.G. Lomov, A. V. Korol’kova. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2004. 832 p.
9. Shanskii N.M., Ivanov V.V., Sovremennyi russkii iazyk [Contemporary Russian]. ch.1. M., 1981. 256 p.
Review
For citations:
Khademi Moghaddam M., Rezaei M. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERSIAN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH A COMPONENT OF BLACK AND WHITE COLORS AND THEIR RUSSIAN EQUIVALENTS. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2018;4(16):114-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2018-4-16-114-119
Views:
675
Email this article 