The media myth creation in the anthropocentric dimension (the english social and political discourse studies)
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-2-26-53-63
Abstract
The paper considers linguistic and discursive features of anthropocentric myth creation in the social and political media. Myth creation in the social and political context is viewed as creation of social and political myths correlating with real and fictional events, public persons or social and political phenomena. The author brings into light the role of the media audience as one of the leading factors ensuring successful creation of the media mythological image appealing predominantly to the emotional sphere in the mass recipient’s consciousness. Strange as it might seem, the anthropocentric mythological discourse demonstrates the minimal amount of explicit emotiveness, which creates conditions for independent evaluation of the information by the audience itself. Narrative is considered to be the basic myth creation format. It is represented as a series of stories about the myth creation object. Given the diachronic aspect of myth creation and its chronotope which can span quite a long period of time, it is suggested to speak of the narrative continuum focused on a media person who is in the centre of public attention. It is pointed out that media myth creation takes place on the basis of implications which appear in the process of reception of factual information by the media audience. The interaction of verbal and non-verbal means typical of the media fosters creation of a full-bodied anthroponymic mythological image, which calls for a special study.
About the Author
О. V. KulikovaRussian Federation
Kulikova Olga Viktorovna – Doctor of Philology, Professor, English Language Department №1
119454, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 76
References
1. Balahonskaya, Yu.V. Otlichitel’nye osobennosti politicheskoi mifologii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015 (3 / 67). S. 189 – 194.
2. Balyasnikova, O.V. Issledovanie rechevogo vozdeistviia v SMI // Iazyk sredstv massovoj informatsii: Sb.obzorov / RAN.INION. Tsentr gumanit. nauch.-inform. issled. Otd.iazykoznaniia: Otv.red. Troshina N.N. M., 2007. S. 99 – 112.
3. Vodak, R. Iazyk. Diskurs. Politika / Per. s angl. i nem. Volgograd: Peremena, 1997. 139 s.
4. Dem’yankov, V.Z. Interpretatsiia politicheskogo diskursa v SMI // Iazyk sredstv massovoi informatsii: Uchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov / Pod red. M. N. Volodinoi. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2008. S.374–393.
5. Kubryakova, E.S. Evoliutsiia lingvisticheskikh idei vo vtoroi polovine XX veka (opyt paradigmal’nogo analiza) // Iazyk i nauka kontsa XX veka: sb. statei. M. 1995. S. 144–238.
6. Mol’, A. Sotsiolingvistika kul’tury. M.: KomKniga, 2005. 416 s.
7. Pastuhov, A.G. Mediazhanry i mediaformaty: k razgranicheniiu poniatii // Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki. 2015(5 / 68). S. 148 – 153.
8. Politicheskie kommunikatsii: Ucheb. posobie dlia studentov vuzov / Petrunin Yu.Yu. i dr. Pod red. A.I. Solov’eva. M.: Aspekt Press. 2004.332 s.
9. Hristova, N.A. Destruktsiia konventsional’nogo stereotipa «vlast’»: (Na materiale mediatekstov) // Iazykovoe soznanie i kul’tura. M., 2005. S. 155 – 163.
10. Sheigal, E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. M.: ITDGK «Gnozis», 2004. 326 s.
11. Shmid, V. Perspektivy i granitsy kognitivnoi narratologii (Po povodu rabot Alana Pal’mera o «fictional mind» i «social mind») // Elektronny zhurnal «Narratorium». 2014, 2014 №1 (7), narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2633109
12. Bruner 2003. The Narrative Construction of Reality.
13. Chafe, W.L. The flow of thought and the flow of language // Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax / Ed. by Talmy Givon. Vol. 12, Academic Press, 1979. P. 159 – 182.
14. Labov, W. Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. Georgetown University roundtable on languages and linguistics, 1981. P. 219–247.
Review
For citations:
Kulikova О.V. The media myth creation in the anthropocentric dimension (the english social and political discourse studies). Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2021;7(2):53-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-2-26-53-63