Professional essay in law as a type of discourse: argumentative aspect
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-2-26-87-97
Abstract
The authors of the article introduced the term ‘a professional essay’ by which is meant a genre of scientific academic discourse. A professional essay in law is a variant, which is characterized by its specific argumentation based on formal and dialectical logic. The formal logic is based on the principles of syllogism. At the same time, one should not equate the logic of discourse with its linguistic structure. For example, the functioning of discursive connectors in the process of argumentation occurs according to the laws of language and is described on the basis of its linguistic specifics (breadth and contextual conditionality of meaning, contextual synonymy, etc.
About the Authors
Е. L. Tunitskaya
Russian Academy of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tunitskaya E.L. – Doctor of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Romance-Germanic Languages
6а, Vorobyovskoe shosse, Moscow, 119285
N. Р. Khomiakova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Khomiakova N.P. – Ed. Doctor, Associate Professor of the Department of the French Language
76, prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Malakhov, V.P. Logika dlia iuristov [Logic for lawyers]. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002, 387s.
2. Tunitskaya E.L. Sopostavitel’nyi analiz diskursivnykh konnektorov “en fait” i “en effet” vo frantsuzskom iazyke [Comparative analysis of discourse connectors “en fait” and “en effet” in French]// Vestnik MGLU. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vypusk 2 (818). M.: MGLU, 2019. S. 114–128.
3. Khomiakova, N.P. Professional’noe esse kak odna iz bazovykh tekhnologii formirovaniia inoyazychnoi kommunikativnoi kompetentsii studentov-nefilologov [Professional essay as one of the basic technologies for the formation of foreign language communicative competence of non-philological students] // Ezhegodnyi sbornik statei prepodavatelei inostrannykh iazykov VAVT. M.: VAVT, 2019. S. 89−99.
4. Khomiakova, N.P., Tunitskaya E.L. Frantsuzskii nauchnyi akademicheskii diskurs kak aspekt kursa po inostrannomu iazyku spetsial’nosti v vuzakh nefilologicheskogo profilia. Monografiya [French scientific academic discourse as an aspect of a foreign language course in a specialty in non-philological universities]. M.:Iazyki narodov mira, 2020. 170 s.
5. Bergel, J.-L. Méthodologie juridique. Droit privé. P.: PUF, 2001. 140 p.
6. Clermont, M. Le rapprochement du droit européen des contrats : enjeux et perspectives. Mémoire de DEA – Lille, École doctorale des sciences juridiques, politiques, économiques et de gestion. 2003. 177p.
7. Cornu, G.Vocabulaire juridique. P.: Pressee Universitaires de France, 2007. 925 p.
8. Damette, E., Dargirolle, F. Méthode de français juridique. P.: Dalloz, 2012. 360 p.
9. Ducrot, O. Opérateurs argumentatifs et visee argumentative// Cahiers de linguistique francaise. Genève. 1983. №5. Р. 36-54.
10. Goubeaux, G., Bihr, Ph. Les épreuves écrites en droit civil: Dissertation, Consultation, Commentaire d’arrêt. P.: L G D J. 2001. 269 p.
11. Mathieu Izorche, M.-L. Le raisonnement juridique. P.: PUF. 2001. 439 p.
12. Pansier, F.-Y. Méthodologie du droit. P.: Litec. 2015. 210 p.
13. Sandevoir, P. Introduction au droit. P.: Dunod. 1991. 320 p.
Review
For citations:
Tunitskaya Е.L., Khomiakova N.Р. Professional essay in law as a type of discourse: argumentative aspect. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2021;7(2):87-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-2-26-87-97
Views:
408
Email this article 