Phonoesthetics of German speech in the perception of Russian speaking recipients
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2022-2-31-63-74
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to study the aesthetic side of sounding German speech perceived by native speakers of the Russian language, as well as to determine the linguistic mechanisms that determine the nature of their assessment. Current changes in Russian-speaking recipients’ perception of the sounding German speech are revealed. The posts in the Internet forums are analyzed, and negative stereotypes are identified which determine the assessment of the aesthetics of German pronunciation, and it origin, with a special role played by feature films about the war against Nazi Germany and documentary chronicles with the speeches of National Socialism leaders. The conclusion is made about the excessive emotionality and aggressiveness of such speeches, however, this manner of speaking is a “stage language” (Bühnensprache) which is not typical of everyday German communication. This aggressively stylized sounding of the German language is used today in popular culture often to create a feeling of rudeness among foreign-language recipients. At the segment level, the negative assessment of sounding German speech by Russianspeaking recipients is associated with the pronunciation of the uvular trembling consonant [ʀ] and the voiced uvular spirant [ʁ]. Aspirates and glottal stops in the German language foster the participants of the experiment and the authors of the posts on the Internet to characterize German speech as clear, but in terms of its melody − as torn or “barking”. Due to the aspiration of voiceless plosives, as well as voiceless palatal spirant [ç], Russian-speaking recipients characterize German speech as hissing and whistling. At the suprasegmental level, greater tension in the pronunciation of sounds, along with a rising tone in neutral communication, make Russian-speaking recipients qualify German speech as rough and aggressive.
About the Author
E. A. ShesterinaRussian Federation
Elena Shesterina, PhD, is Assistant Professor of Department of the German Language
76, Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Velichkova, L.V. “Psikholingvisticheskaia osnova issledovaniia emotsional’nosti zvuchashchei rechi” [Psycholinguistic basis for the study of the emotionality of sounding speech]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki, vol. 5, 2007, pp. 20−27.
2. Glushak, V.M. “Rol’ emotsii v strukture rechepovedencheskikh modusov” [The role of emotions in the structure of speech behavioral modes]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia, vol. 2, 2006, pp. 50−57.
3. Glushak, V.M. Stereotypenbedingte Einstellungen in der wechselseitigen Wahrnehmung von Deutschen und Russen. Moscow: MGIMO, 2018.
4. Karaulov, Iu.N. et al. Russkii assotsiativnyi slovar’. T. I. Ot stimula k reaktsii: okolo 7000 reaktsii. T. 2. Ot stimula k reaktsii: bolee 100 000 reaktsii [Russian associative dictionary. Vol. I. From stimulus to response: Approx. 7000 incentives. Vol. II. From stimulus to response: Over 100,000 responses]. Мoscow: AST-Astrel’, 2002.
5. Kask, N.A. “Foneticheskii portret soldata vermakhta v kommunikativnom soznanii rossiiskogo zritelia“ [Phonetic portrait of a wehrmacht soldier in the communicative mind of the Russian viewer]. Collegium linguisticum: materialy ezhegodnoi konferentsii Studencheskogo nauchnogo soobshchestva MGLU, Moscow, March 14–15, 2019. 2019. Мoscow: MGLU, 2019, pp. 253−261.
6. Levshunov, N.D. “Fonoestetika kak odin iz osnovopolagaiushchikh priznakov pri sozdanii vymyshlennykh iazykov khudozhestvennoi deistvitel’nosti (na materiale sopostavleniia Klingonskogo iazyka i iazyka Kven’ia)“ [Phonoesthetics as one of the fundamental features in the creation of fictitious languages of artistic reality (by comparing the Klingon language and the Quenya language)]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, vol. 3(57), part 2, 2016, pp. 100−104.
7. Musaeva, E.G. “Foneticheskie aspekty rechevogo vozdeistviia v britanskoi politicheskoi rechi“ [Phonetic Aspects of Speech Impact in British Political Speech]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, vol. 1, part 1, 2016, pp. 123−127.
8. Nikolaeva, T.M. Intonatsiia slozhnogo predlozheniia v slavyanskikh iazykakh [Compound sentence intonation in Slavic languages]. Moscow: Nauka, 1969.
9. Popova, Z.D., and Sternin, I.A. Iazyk i natsional’naia kartina mira [Language and national picture of the world]. Voronezh: Istoki, 2007.
10. Pospelova, S.N. “Auditivnyi analiz spontannoi zvuchashchei detskoi rechi s ispol’zovaniem kataloga prosodicheskikh priznakov” [Auditory analysis of spontaneous sounding children’s speech using a catalog of prosodic features]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia, vol. 4, 2018, pp. 88−93.
11. Potapova, R.K., and Potapov, V.V. Iazyk, rech’, lichnost’ [Language, speech, personality]. Moscow: Iazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2006.
12. Rogova, M.K. “Sopostavlenie foneticheskikh sistem nemetskogo i russkogo iazykov” [Comparison of the phonetic systems of the German and Russian languages]. Russkii iazyk za rubezhom, vol. 57, no. 1, 1979, pp. 18−23.
13. Tambovtsev, Iu.A. “Evfoniia zvukovoi tsepochki iazyka” [Euphony of the sound chain of a language]. Sibirskii filologicheskii zhurnal, vol. 1, 2010, pp. 108−115.
14. Crabtree, M. and Powers, J. “Arbitrariness in Language”. Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Univ. Press, 2000. pp. 226−230.
15. Dössel. Ch. „Schöne Stimmen“. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 29 Apr. 2016, https://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/theater-schoene-stimmen-1.2973343 (accessed: 12.01.2022).
16. Eichinger, L.M. et al. Aktuelle Spracheinstellungen in Deutschland: erste Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Repräsentativumfrage. Mannheim: Institut für deutsche Sprache, 2009.
17. Stock, E. „Wirkungen des Stimm- und Sprechausdrucks“. Sprechwirkung: Grundfragen, Methoden und Ergebnisse ihrer Erforschung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1991, pp. 59−142.
18. Trojan, F. Biophonetik. Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut AG, 1975
Review
For citations:
Shesterina E.A. Phonoesthetics of German speech in the perception of Russian speaking recipients. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2022;8(2):63-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2022-2-31-63-74