Types and functions of precedent names in English-language cinematic discourse

The subject of this study is precedent names in the English-language cinematic discourse. The focus is placed on determining the functional potential of precedent names in this type of discourse. In this work, precedent names are considered as a kind of precedent phenomena: names of personalities, events and works of fiction. The study of precedent names has significance within the framework of cultural linguistics, cognitive science and intertextuality theory, as precedent names contain information about important cultural and historical phenomena, give insights into the mechanism of metaphorization, and serve to create intertextual connections. The frequency of their use in different types of discourse, especially in cinematic discourse, is steadily increasing, which explains the relevance of research in this field. Using the methods of discourse analysis, functional-semantic analysis, inductive analysis and continuous sampling, we examine the types of precedent names, source spheres and the functions that these lexical units perform in cinematic discourse. Such analysis makes it possible to establish the cultural significance of personalities, events, and other phenomena, as well as their reflection in such a mass art form as cinematography. Due to its mass appeal and depiction of various social groups, cinematic discourse is of particular interest within the framework of sociolinguistics in regard to such culturally significant units as precedent names. The analysis of the functions of precedent names allows one to establish their role in cinematic discourse, their artistic value, semantic potential and cultural significance. The analysis revealed which types of precedent names are most frequently used in the English-language cinematic discourse (anthroponyms and names of works of art); identified productive sources of precedent names (the sphere of art and the social sphere); and introduced a list of characteristic functions that precedent names perform in cinematic discourse (among which ludic and evaluative functions are especially prominent).

1. Filinsky, A. Kritichesky Analiz Politicheskogo Diskursa Predvybornykh Kampany 1999–2000 gg. [Critical Analysis of Political Discourse of Pre-election Campaigns of 1999–2000]. Tver State University, 2002. 163 p.

2. Gudkov, D. Pretsedentnoe Imia i Problemy Pretsedentnosti [Precedent Name and Precedence Problems]. 2nd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2020. 152 p.

3. Karaulov, Y. Russky Iazyk i Iazykovaia Lichnost’ [Russian Language and Language Personality]. 6th ed. Moscow: URSS, 2007. 264 p.

4. Krasnykh, V. Etnopsikholingvistika i Lingvokul’turologiia: Kurs Lektsy [Ethnopsycholinguistics and Cultural Linguistics: a Course of Lectures]. Moscow: Gnosis, 2002. 284 p.

5. Kushneruk, S. Sopostavitel’noe Issledovanie Pretsedentnykh Imen v Rossiiskoy i Amerikanskoy Reklame [Comparative Study of Precedent Names in Russian and American Advertising]. Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2006. 218 p.

6. Lotman, Y. Semiotika Kino i Problemy Kinoestetiki [Semiotics of Cinema and Problems of Cinema Aesthetics]. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1973. 140 p.

7. Nakhimova, E. Pretsedentnye Imena v Massovoy Kommunikatsii [Precedent Names in Mass Communication]. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University, 2007. 208 p.

8. Semenets, O. Pretsedentny Tekst v Iazyke Gazety (Dinamika Diskursa 50–90-kh Godov) [Precedent Text in Newspaper Discourse (Dynamics of Discourse of 50–90s)]. Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 2004. 356 p.

9. Slyshkin, G. Ot Teksta k Simvolu: Lingvokul’turnye Kontsepty Pretsedentnykh Tekstov v Soznanii i Diskurse [From Text to Symbol: the Linguocultural Concepts of Precedent Texts in Consciousness and Discourse]. Moscow: Akademia, 2000. 288 p.

10. Sorokin, Y, & Mikhaleva, I. Pretsedentny tekst kak sposob fiksatsii iazykovogo soznaniia [The precedent text as an embodiment of language consciousness]. Iazyk i Soznanie: Paradoksal’naia Ratsional’nost’ [Language and Consciousness: Paradoxical Rationality]. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1993. P. 98–117.

11. Suprun, A. Tekstovye reministsentsii kak iazykovoe iavlenie [Textual reminiscences as linguistic phenomenon]. Topics in the Study of Language, 1995, no. 6. P. 17–29.

12. Tsivian, Y. K metasemioticheskomu opisaniiu povestvovaniia v kinematografe [Concerning metasemiotic description of narration in cinema]. Struktura Dialoga kak Printsip Raboty Semioticheskogo Mekhanizma [The Structure of the Dialogue as a Principle of Operation of the Semiotic Mechanism]. Tartu: Tartu State University, 1984. P. 109–121.

13. Vorozhtsova, O. Lingvisticheskoe Issledovanie Pretsedentnykh Fenomenov v Diskurse Rossiiskikh i Amerikanskikh Prezidentskikh Vyborov 2004 Goda [Linguistic Study of Precedent Phenomena in the Discourse of Russian and American Presidential Elections of 2004]. Ural State Pedagogical University, 2007. 215 p.

14. Zabotkina, V. Kognitivny analiz semantiki slova: perspektivy issledovany [Cognitive analysis of word semantics: research prospects]. Metody Kognitivnogo Analiza Semantiki Slova: Krugly Stol [Methods of Cognitive Analysis of Word Semantics: Round Table]. Saint Petersburg: RGGU, 2011. P. 45–56.

15. Zaretskaya, A. Osobennosti Realizatsii Podteksta v Kinodiskurse [Peculiarities of Subtext Realization in Cinematic Discourse]. Chelyabinsk: Abris, 2012. 192 p.