Preview

Linguistics & Polyglot Studies

Advanced search

The structure of conditional sentence in the newspaper journalistic style of standard Turkishl

https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2023-3-36-128-142

Abstract

The article is devoted to the use of various means of expressing the functional-semantic field of condition by reference to the Turkish press of the 20th – 21st centuries, which is considered the most “democratic” and flexible style of standard language. The structure of complex sentence in modern Turkish has not been so far in the focus of researchers, which determines the topicality and scientific novelty of this paper. The aim of the study is to determine the basic tendencies in Turkish syntax in the diachronic aspect during the last century, using the methods of comparative and quantitative linguistics. The research results show that in the newspaper journalistic style of the modern Turkish language preference is being given to morphological (forms of conditional mood and, less frequently, conditional modality) and lexical-syntactic (constructions made with verbal forms and auxiliary words) means of expressing condition. It is noted that periphrastic forms of conditional mood and modality are not used in the 21st century. There is a decrease in number of lexical means originating from Arabic and Persian, which can be the result of the evolution of the Turkish mass media language; moreover, writers refuse to use conjunctions due to them being optional in a Turkish conditional sentence. In addition, in the Turkish press of the 21st century, means that express substantival instead of adjectival meaning and do not contain temporality are used with higher frequency. Previous studies carried out on the topic of sentences of concession, reason and comparison in the Turkish press show similar results.

About the Author

K. Verkhova
Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Ksenia Verkhova is a PhD student and translator at Department of Turkic Studies, Institute of Asian and African Studies.

1 bld. 13, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Alekseeva, О. Leksiko-grammaticheskie osobennosti prjamoi i kosvennoi rechi v turetskikh novostnykh materialakh [Lexical and grammatical aspects of direct and indirect speech in the Turkish news language]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 5. P. 9–25.

2. Alekseeva, О. Sintaksicheskie osobennosti turetskikh novostnykh materialov [Syntactic features of the Turkish news language]. Litera, 2021, no. 10. P. 44–60.

3. Baskakov, N. Predlozhenie v Sovremennom Turetskom Iazyke [Sentence in Modern Turkish]. Мoscow, 1984. 200 p.

4. Verkhova, K. Kauzal’nost’ v iazyke turetskoi pressy: diahronicheskii aspekt [Causality in the language of the Turkish press: a diachronic aspect]. Programma i Tezisy XXIX Mezhdunarodnoy Nauchnoy Konferentsii “Dmitrievskie Chteniia” [Program and Abstracts of the 29th Dmitriev Readings International Conference]. Moscow, 2021. P. 26.

5. Verkhova, K. Vyrazhenie protivitel’nosti i ustupitel’nosti v iazyke turetskoi pressy [Grammatical meanings of opposition and concession in the language of the Turkish press]. Mezhdunarodnaia Nauchnaia Konferentsiia “XXXVI Kononovskie Chteniia”. Tezisy Dokladov [36th Kononov Readings International Conference. Book of Abstracts], turkicstudies.ru/assets/uploads/2021/10/Tezisy_dokladov.zip (accessed 17 March 2022).

6. Guzev, V. Teoreticheskaia Grammatika Turetskogo Iazyka [Theoretical Grammar of the Turkish Language]. Saint Petersburg, 2015. 320 p.

7. Guzev, V., Avrutina, A. Funktsional’ny Sintaksis Sovremennogo Turetskogo Iazyka [Functional Syntax of Modern Turkish]. Saint Petersburg, 2013. 70 p.

8. Deniz-Iylmaz, O. Sredstva Nominalizatsii Deistviia v Turetskom Iazyke [Means of Nominalization of Action in the Turkish Language]. Saint Petersburg, 2005. 168 p.

9. Kononov, A. Grammatika Turetskogo Iazyka [Grammar of the Turkish Language]. Moscow, 1941. 313 p.

10. Kuznetsov, P.I. Poriadok slov v prostom predlozhenii turetskogo iazyka [Word order in a simple sentence of the Turkish language]. Ocherki Tipologii Poriadka Slov [Essays on the Typology of Word Order]. Moscow, 1989. P. 31–41.

11. Kuznetsov, P. Sistema Funktsional’nykh Form Glagola v Sovremennom Turetskom Iazyke [System of Functional Verbal Forms in Modern Turkish]. Мoscow, 1982. 375 p.

12. Napolnova, Е., Verkhova, К. О protsesse formirovaniia turetskogo literaturnogo iazyka [On the process of the formation of standard Turkish]. Tiurkskie Iazyki i Literatury v Istoricheskoi Perspektive [Turkic Languages and Literatures from a Historical Perspective]. (Е. Оganova ed.). Мoscow, 2022. P. 269–283.

13. Oganova, E., & Larionova, E. Sovremenny Turetskii Iazyk: Praktikum po Grammatike. Uchebno-Metodichesky Kompleks [Modern Turkish: Grammar Practicum. Study Complex]. Part 2. Moscow, 2018. 184 p.

14. Panov, M. O literaturnom iazyke [On standard language]. In: Panov, M. Trudy po Obschemu Iazykoznaniiu i Russkomu Iazyku [Works on General Linguistics and the Russian Language]. Vol. 1. Мoscow, 2004. P. 88–102.

15. Sofronova, L. Turetskii Iazyk – I. Obshchestvenno-Politichesky Perevod: Uchebnoe Posobie [The Turkish Language – I. Social and Political Translation: Student’s Book]. Мoscow, 2019. 343 p.

16. Turetskii Iazyk: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia i Zarubezhnoe Regionovedenie. Uchebnik dlia Magistratury. V Trekh Chastiakh. Uroven’ C1. [The Turkish Language: International Relations and Foreign Regional Studies: Master Student’s Book. In 3 parts. C1 Level] (А. Kostiukhin & А. Shtanov; ed. by I. Ivanova). Part 1. Moscow, 2020. 230, [2] p.

17. Shtanov, A. Territorial’nye, vozrastnye i professional’nye aspekty leksicheskoy variativnosti v sovremennom turetskom iazyke v svete resheniia problemy vzaimoponimaniia v ramkakh monolingvalnoi kommunikatsii [Territorial, age-specific and professional aspects of lexical variations in modern Turkish in the light of solving the problem of mutual understanding within the scope of monolingual communication]. Lingvostranovedenie: Metody Analiza, Tekhnika Obucheniia. Chetverty Mezhvuzovskii Seminar po Lingvostranovedeniiu [Culture-Oriented Linguistics: Methods of Analysis and Teaching Techniques. Forth Inter-University Seminar on Culture-Oriented Linguistics]. Мoscow, 2007. P. 232–242.

18. Shtanov, A. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniia arabizmov v sovremennom turetskom iazyke [Specific features of the functioning of Arabic loanwords in modern Turkish]. Aktual’nye Problemy Arabskoy Filologii: Sbornik Nauchnykh Trudov k 125-letiiu so Dnia Rozhdeniia Kh. K. Baranova i K. V. Ode-Vasilievoy [Topical Issues in Arabic Linguistics: a Collection of Papers in Honour of the 125th Anniversary of the Birth of Kh. Baranov & K. Ode-Vasilieva] (ed. by A. Shtanov). Moscow, 2018. 360, p. [1].

19. Scheka, Yu. Prakticheskaia Grammatika Turetskogo Iazyka [Practical Grammar of the Turkish Language]. Moscow, 2007. 666 p.

20. GAZETELER. Ankara Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi, dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12575/60/ (accessed 27 November 2020).

21. Haberleri – KANAL SİYASET TV, kanalsiyaset.com/ (accessed 21 January 2021).

22. Haberler SABAH ile Okunur, sabah.com.tr/ (accessed 21 January 2021).

23. Milliyet – Haberler, Son Dakika Haberleri ve Güncel Haber, milliyet.com.tr/ (accessed 21 January 2021).

24. Son Dakika – Son Dakika Haberleri – Son Haberler, sondakika.com/ (accessed 21 January 2021).

25. Takdirde nedir ne demek Takdirde hakkında bilgiler, nedir.ileilgili.org/takdirde (accessed 8 February 2021).

26. Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri, sozluk.gov.tr/ (accessed 08 February 2021).


Review

For citations:


Verkhova K. The structure of conditional sentence in the newspaper journalistic style of standard Turkishl. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2023;9(3):128-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2023-3-36-128-142

Views: 577


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2423 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3717 (Online)