Structuring Japanese editorials along the lines of rhetorical structure annotations: issues and discoveries
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2023-4-37-120-144
Abstract
This paper is a result of a practical experiment in annotating the rhetorical structure of three editorial articles from the leading Japanese newspapers, focused on connectors and their role in the text. Annotation work was carried out along the general lines of existing techniques, at the same time calling for substantial adjustments in both the relations’ taxonomy and orientation, and also the principles of breaking down discourse units. These methodological findings are reviewed in the conclusive part. The main difficulty in representing the overall text structure is whether it can be convincingly represented in the form of a tree (as is expected from a pragmatically organized text). Some in-depth analysis shows that apart from rhetorical relations between discourse units a complex networks of holistic structure (macrostructure), intentional structure, referential network are of not less importance in the unity of the text. Notional structure in the basis of the reader’s comprehension also comes into the bargain, as well as the author’s efforts to influence and direct it overtly or covertly. An RST tree would only be a part of this totality. Appended are tentative graphical representations of an approximated tree structure as well as graphs covering the text’s intentional structure, divided into interconnected layers. This experiment highlighted major peculiarities of a newspaper editorial as one type of text. They are seen as rooted in the pragmatical nature of this genre of language activity, whose principal aim is opinion leadership and of the audience that is highly heterogenous but at the same time capable of detecting and processing sophisticated logical and rhetorical devices. That imposes some structural conditions besides general structure specialties of the Japanese language.
About the Authors
S. V. ChironovRussian Federation
Sergey V. Chironov – PhD in Linguistics, Assistant Professor, Head of the Department of Japanese, Korean, Indonesian and Mongolian linguistics
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow 119454
V. A. Mozebakh
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Mozebakh – Master course graduate, Lecturer, Department of Japanese, Korean, Indonesian and Mongolian linguistics
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow 119454
References
1. Anan’eva, M. I., M. V. Kobozeva. Diskursivnyĭ analiz v zadachakh obrabotki estestvennogo iazyka // Informatika, upravlenie i sistemnyj analiz: Trudy IV Vserossiĭskoĭ nauchnoĭ konferentsii molodykh uchenykh s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem.–TI–Tver’: Tverskoj gosudarstvennyĭ tekhnicheskiĭ universitet. (Discourse analysis in natural language processing // Informatics, administration and system analysis – papers of IV All-Russian workshop, Tver state technical university) 2016. С. 138-148.
2. Bass, I.I. Problemy sovremennogo iaponskogo yazykoznania. Lingvistika teksta (Issues in contemporary Japanese linguistics. Text linguistics). St.Petersburg SPBGUKI 2004. 371 p.
3. In’kova, O. Iu. (ed.) Struktura konnektorov i metody ee opisaniia (Connectors structure and methods of its description). Thorus press 2019. 316 p.
4. Kibrik, A. A., Podlesskaia, V. I. (ed.). Rasskazy o snovideniiakh: Korpusnoe issledovanie ustnogo russkogo diskursa (Dreams retold – Corpus study of colloquial Russian discourse). Iazyki slavianskikh kultur 2009.736 p.
5. Litvinenko, A. O. Opisanie struktury diskursa v ramkakh Teorii Ritoricheskoĭ Struktury: primenenie na russkom materiale // Trudy Mezhdunarodnogo seminara «Dialog». (Discourse structure description in the RST framework – applied to Russian. International seminar papers Dialog) 2001. p. 159-168.
6. Rufova, E.S., Argunova, T.V. Funktsional’nye osobennosti iaponskikh gazetnykh zagolovkov (na materiale iaponskoĭ gazety “Mainichi Shimbun”) (Functional properties of Japanese editorial article headings) // Sovremennyj diskurs-analiz, 2018. P. 1518.
7. Testelec, Y.A. Vvedenie v obshchiĭ sintaksis. (Introduction to general syntax) RGGU. 2001. 797 p.
8. Chironov, S.V. Opyt annotirovaniia konnektorov v iaponoiazychnom tekste: uroki i perspektivy (An essay in connector annotation in Japanese texts – lessons and prospects). Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO. 2022; 8(4). P. 64-88.
9. Chironov, S.V. Iaponskie diskurs-markery s akkumuliativnym znacheniem // Materialy nauchno-metodicheskoĭ konferencii «Yaponskiĭ yazyk v vuze: aktual’nye problemy prepodavaniya» (oktyabr’ 2018 g.) (Accumulative discourse markers in Japanese. Papers of conference ‘Japanese in high school’, October 2018, Кliuch-S, 2019. p. 155-167.
10. Chudinov, A.P. Kognitivno-diskursivnoe issledovanie politicheskoĭ metafory (Cognitive discourse study of political metaphor) // Voprosy kognitivnoĭ lingvistiki 1. 2004. P. 91-105.
11. Chironov, S.V. Cohesion and connection – Japanese data // Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 2022, 5 (33), https://rulb.org/archive/5-33-2022-september/10.18454/RULB.2022.33.1 (accessed 15.11. 2022).
12. De Beaugrande, Robert and Dressler, Wolfgang. Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman, London-New York, 1981, 270 p.
13. Grosz, B. J, Sidner, C.L. Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse. 1986. Computational Linguistics. 12 (3). P. 175204.
14. Hayashi, Katsuhiko, and Tsutomu Hirao, and Masaaki Nagata. “Empirical comparison of dependency conversions for RST discourse trees.” Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue. 2016. P. 128-136.
15. Hinds, John. “Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 3.2. 1983. P. 183-196.
16. Kaplan, R. “Cultural Thought Patterns in Intercultural Education”, Language Learning, 16, 1966. p. 1-20.
17. Kubota, Ryuko. “A reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese written discourse: Implications for contrastive rhetoric.” Written communication 14.4. 1997. P. 460-480.
18. Marcu, Daniel, Estibaliz Amorrortu, and Magdalena Romera. “Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees.” Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging. 1999. 48-57.
19. Mann, W. C., Thompson, S. A. Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Technical Report ISI/RS87-190, ISI, Los Angeles, CA, 1987 p.1-81.
20. Prasad, R. et al. Annotating attribution in the Penn Discourse TreeBank. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, 2006. P. 31–38.
21. Redeker, G. Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29, 1991. P. 1139-1172.
22. Reese, Brian & Hunter et al. Reference Manual for the Analysis and Annotation of Rhetorical Structure (Version 1.0). 2007, http://timeml.org/jamesp/annotation_manual.Pdf (accessed 21.11.2021)
23. Schiffrin, Deborah. Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton, eds., The handbook of discourse analysis 54–75. 2021. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. Webber, Bonnie Lynn, and Aravind K. Joshi. “Anchoring a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar for discourse.” arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9806017 (1998).
25. Asahi Shimbun URL=https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S15270230.html
26. 市川孝(1978) 『国語教育のための文章論概説』教育出版 (Ichikawa Т. General sentence structure – for purposes of Japanese teaching. Kyoiku shuppan) 236 p.
27. 金子 貴美「日本語談話関係認識のための 理論とコーパス構築」(お茶の水女子大学大学院 博士学位論文) (Каneko Т. Тheory of comprehension of rhetorical relations and corpus building. Phd thesis, Ochanomizu university) 2019. 91 p.
28. 高松正毅. 「起承転結」小考. 高崎経済大学論集 (高崎経済大学経済学会) (Takamatsu M. Notes on ‘Kishodenketsu’. Papers of Takazaki economic university), 2004. 46 (4). P. 115-122.
29. Mainichi Shimbun https://mainichi.jp/articles/20221009/ddm/005/070/098000c (accessed 20.10.2022).
30. Yomiuri Shimbun https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/editorial/20220923-OYT1T50267/ (accessed 11.11.2022).
Review
For citations:
Chironov S.V., Mozebakh V.A. Structuring Japanese editorials along the lines of rhetorical structure annotations: issues and discoveries. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2023;9(4):120-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2023-4-37-120-144