Gender asymmetries of the category “appearance” in the English language (based on the analysis of attributive-nominal word combinations with the core lexemes “man” and “woman”)

The relevance of this article is determined by the increasing interest in the asymmetries of gender-sensitive categories like “appearance” or “beauty”. The history of the issue and detailed results of contemporary studies in this field have been outlined in the article. The category of appearance has long been considered gender-biased and asymmetric, being related more to women than to men. Present-day studies offer support for the idea that notions of appearance and beauty are unevenly linked to women, resulting in a multitude of societal and individual difficulties. Certain modern linguists even argue that the concept of beauty is employed as a narrative to perpetuate women’s feelings of discontent and self-criticism. Our work presents an attempt to measure the relevance of this supposition against practical data of the semantic analysis of collocations with the core lexemes “man” and “woman”. A total of 2,814 noun phrases relevant to the category of appearance have been extracted from the texts of the British National Corpus of the English language. Three subcategories have been distinguished in the process of continuous sampling: parametric characteristics of appearance, general characteristics, and assessments. The method of comparative analysis allowed us to make conclusions regarding the degree of validity of assumptions about the asymmetry of the category of appearance in the English language. The analysis was carried out in two stages: the first stage required a general comparison of the amount and semantic nature of attribute-nominal word combinations with the core lexemes “man” and “woman”. The second stage of analysis was based on connotational analysis of nominal constructions semantics in the context of positive and negative characteristics of females’ and males’ appearance. The summary data of the study allowed us to present reliable evidence-based conclusions about the objective characteristics of the category of appearance. The study questions the widespread belief that the category of appearance is gender-biased and suggests considering it as a significant androgenic characteristic relevant to both men and women.

1. Barchunova, T.V. Seksizm v bukvare [Sexism in the primer] / T.V. Barchunova // EKO: Ekonomika i organizatsiia prom. pr-va [ECO: Economics and industrial organization of manufacturing]. Novosibirsk, 1995. № 3, p. 133−155.

2. Vul, S.M. Teoreticheskie predposylki diagnostirovaniia polovoy prinadlezhnosti avtora dokumenta [Theoretical basis for diagnosing the gender identity of the author of the document] / S.M. Vul, A.P. Martyniuk // Sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy razvitiia traditsionnykh vidov kriminalisticheskoy ekspertizy [Current state and prospects for the development of traditional types of forensic examination]. M., 1987, p. 105−112.

3. Goroshko, E.I. Osobennosti muzhskogo i zhenskogo rechevogo povedeniia (psikholingvisticheskiy analiz) [Features of male and female speech behavior (psycholinguistic analysis) ]: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19 / E.I. Goroshko. M., 1996. 26 p.

4. Gukos’iants, O.IU. Diagnostika gendernoy identichnosti uchastnikov chat-kommunikatsii na osnove analiza angloiazychnykh nikneymov [Distinguishing gender identity of chat communication participants based on the analysis of English nicknames] / O.IU Gukos’iants, L.M. Khacheresova // Vestnik Piatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Pyatigorsk State University]. 2013. № 4, p. 69−75.

5. Dubovskiy, IU.A. Problemy mezhkul’turnogo obshcheniia: genderny aspect [Problems of intercultural communication: gender aspect] / IU.A. Dubovskiy, N.L. Greydina // Kommunikatsiia: teoriia i praktika v razlichnykh sotsial’nykh kontekstakh: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Communication: theory and practice in various social contexts: materials of the international scientific and practical conference]. Pyatigorsk, 2002, p. 54−57.

6. Zemskaya, E.A. Osobennosti muzhskoy i zhenskoy rechi [Features of male and female speech] / E.A. Zemskaya, M.A. Kitaygorodskaya, N.N Rozanova // Russkiy iazyk v ego funktsionirovanii [Russian language in its functioning] / pod red. E.A. Zemskoy i D.N. Shmeleva. M., 1993, p. 90−136.

7. Kirilina, A.V. Gender: lingvisticheskie aspekty [Gender: linguistic aspects] / A.V. Kirilina. M.: Izd-vo In-ta sotsiologii RAN, 1999, 189 p.

8. Leont’eva, A.A. Stereotipy muzhskikh i zhenskikh kachestv v rechi avtorov – muzhchin i zhenshchin [Stereotypes of male and female qualities in the speech of male and female authors.] / A.A. Leont’eva, A.P. Martynyuk. Khar’kov: Izd-vo KHGU, 1989, 9 p.

9. Ol’shanskiy, I.G. Gendernye issledovaniia kak odno iz napravleniy sotsiolingvistiki [Gender studies as one of the areas of socio-linguistics] // Problemy sotsiolingvistiki i mnogoiazychiia [Problems of sociolinguistics and multilingualism] / I.G. Ol’shanskiy. M., 1997. № 1, p. 32−34.

10. Tolstokorova, A.V. Genderno–chuvstvitel’naia reforma iazyka kak element global’noy sotsial’noy politiki: opyt mezhdunarodnogo zhenskogo dvizheniia [Gender-sensitive language reform as an element of global social policy: the experience of the international women’s movement] / A.V. Tolstokorova // Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki [Journal of Social Policy Research]. M., 2005. T. 3, № 1, p. 87−110.

11. Brumberg, J. The body project. An intimate history of American girls. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2010. 336 p.

12. Cameron, D. Rethinking language and gender studies: some issues for the 1990s // Language and Gender: interdisciplinary perspectives. ed. by Harlow, S.M..: Longman, 1995, p. 31–44.

13. Coates, J. Women, men and language. 3rd edn. Harlow: Longman, 2004. 245 p.

14. Engeln, R. Beauty sick. How the cultural obsession with appearance hurts girls and women. New York: HarperCollins, 2017, 400 p.

15. Etcoff, N. Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Doubleday, Beauty, Personal, 1999, 325 p.

16. Fishman, P. Interaction: The work women do // Language, gender and society. ed. by Thorne B., Kramarae C. and Henley N., 1983, p.p. 89–102.

17. Gray, J. Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationship. New York: Harper Collins, 1992, 286 p.

18. Jespersen, O. Language, its nature, development and origin. London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1922, 448 p.

19. Spender, D. Man made language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980, 268 p.

20. Tannen, D. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow, 1990, 330 p.

21. West, C., Zimmerman D. H. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation // Thorne. ed. by B. and N. Henley, 1975, p. 105–129.

22. Whitefield-Madrano, A. A. face value. The hidden ways beauty shapes women’s lives. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2016, 275 p.

23. Wolf, N. The beauty myth. How images of beauty are used against women. New York Harper Collins, 2002, 348 p.