Preview

Linguistics & Polyglot Studies

Advanced search

The Place of Independent Infinitive Structures in the System of English Sentences

https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2025-1-42-28-42

Abstract

The study presents a comprehensive analysis of independent infinitive structures with nonfinite predicates, focusing on their syntactic, pragmatic, and stylistic aspects. These clauses, which exhibit interrogative and exclamatory features, are characterized by non-standard syntax, granting them a unique place within the system of English sentences. The paper categorizes these units into three groups: 1) Infinitive structures with the particle “to” at the front (To + infinitive); 2) Infinitive structures with a topical subject (S + to + infinitive); 3) Structures with “Why + (not) + infinitive?”. Special attention is given to the first and second types of infinitive structures, which have not been the focus of prior research. These types are distinguished by specific language features, which necessitate a thorough investigation to determine their unique syntactic status. In contrast to the third type of infinitive units, two synonymous structures with the finite form of the predicate are examined to highlight differences in their pragmatic content and usage patterns. The study also presents a distribution scale of the five patterns according to their pragmatic meanings and frequency of occurrences. These models highlight the following pragmatic features: admiration, amazement, invitation, resentment, disappointment, satisfaction, solidarity, irritation, disbelief, and despair. The current study also provides a quantitative analysis of infinitive structure usage in British and American literature, revealing a predominance of negative illocutionary acts, with positive acts primarily observed in IIS1 structures. In addition, the paper has established a greater frequency of structures represented by finite verbs (CSS1 and CSS2) compared with those having non-finite predicates (IIS3). The contrastive analysis revealed significant syntactic, pragmatic, and stylistic differences between the third type of infinitive structures (IIS3) and their synonymous finite predicates (CSS1 and CSS2). Negative illocutive acts were predominant across all patterns, with positive acts primarily in IIS1. The highest frequency of occurrences was found in structures with finite predicates. Additionally, the study identified syntactic, pragmatic, and stylistic constraints on IIS3, noting the absence of to-infinitives, contrary to some linguistic claims.

About the Author

Z. V. Kostanian
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Zara V. Kostanian, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor at the Chair of Media Linguistics of the Faculty of Journalism, 

9, Mokhovaya St., Moscow, 1250009.



References

1. Aljovic, Nadira. Non-Finite Clauses in English: Formal Properties and Function, 2017, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nadira-Aljovic/publication/313927589/Nonfinite-clauses-in-English/links/60c70b02a6fdcc2e61405cb2 (Accessed 28 February 2024).

2. Biber, Douglas. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English/ Biber Douglas, Johansson Stig, Leech Geoffrey, Conrad Susan, Finegan Edward Harlow. London: Pierson Education Limited, 2000.

3. Blokh, Michael. A Course of Theoretical English Grammar. Moscow: Visshaia Shkola, 1983.

4. Callies, Marcus. Bare Infinitival Complements in Present-day English // The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora/ Marcus Callies, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech and Sean Wallis (eds.). 2016, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/verb-phrase/book/callies.pdf (Accessed 24 January 2024).

5. Cambridge Dictionary, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/clauses-finite-and-nonfinite (Accessed 12 November 2024).

6. Carter, Ronald. Cambridge Grammar of English/ Ronald Carter and Michael McCarthy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

7. Dixon, R.M. W. A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: Oxford University, 1991.

8. De Haan, Pieter. Postmodifying Clauses in the English Noun Phrase: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam, 1989, https://Rodopi.books.google.am/books?id=1kWt (Accessed 3 December 2024).

9. Duffley, Patrick. A Natural-Language Semantic Approach to Infinitival and Gerund-Participial Complementation in English/ English Linguistics. 2016. P. 55−67.

10. Duffley, Patrick. Wh-words and Infinitives in English /Patrick Duffley and Peter Ens. Lingua 98, 1966. P. 221−141.

11. Eastwood, John. Oxford Guide to English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

12. Jacobs, Roderick. English Syntax: A Grammar for English Language Professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. 378 p.

13. Jespersen, Otto. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles // Part V: Syntax. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, 1940.

14. Kozáciková, Zuzana. To- Infinitive in Academic Discourse - Native and Non-Native Writers Compared// Discourse and Interaction, Volume 8 (1), 2015. P. 53−64.

15. Kreidler, Charles. Introducing English Semantics. New York: Routledge, 2002. 352 p.

16. LanGeek. English Grammar. https://LanGeek.co/en/grammar/course/704/nonfinite-clauses (Accessed 4 March 2024).

17. Matinian, Gayaneh. The Split Infinitive in Modern English Grammar, 2022, https://www.academia.edu/91599193/The_Split_Infinitive_in_Modern_English_Grammar?form=MG0AV3/ (Accessed 7 December 2024).

18. Matthews, Peter H. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

19. Mittwoch, Anita. On the Distribution of Bare Infinitive Complements in English// Journal of Linguistics. Volume 26 (1). Pp. 103-131. https://www.seilo.ac.jp/graduate/falit-grad-school/english-literature/academic-journals/itmo4200000068jr-att/a|592462280934.pdf (Accessed 8 December 2023).

20. Parrot, Martin. Grammar for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 470 p.

21. Payne, Thomas E. Understanding English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 452 p.

22. Quirk, Randolph. A University Grammar of English /Randolph Quirk and Sidney Greenbaum. London: Longman, 1978.

23. Radford, Andrew. English Syntax. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 398 p.

24. Radford, Andrew. Analysing English Sentences. A Minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 526 p.

25. Semerjyan, Maria. The Split Infinitive in Modern English. https://www.academia.edu/28206300/The_Split_Infinitive_in_Modern_English (Accessed 15 January 2025).

26. Swan, Michael. Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 635 p.

27. Van linden, An. The rise of the to-infinitive: Evidence from adjectival Complementation// English Language and Linguistics. Volume 4 (1), 2022. Pp. 19−51, https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/210999/1/AVL_2010ELL_Riseofto-infinitive_final.pdf?form=MG0AV3 (Accessed 15 January 2025).

28. Veselovska, Ludmila. On Bare Infinitives in English, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ludmila-Veselovska-2/publication/325847726_On_Bare_Infinitives_in_English/links/5b28ce5f0f7e9b1d00348796/On-Bare-Infinitives-in-English.pdf?form=MG0AV3 (Accessed 3 October 2024).

29. Wierzbicka, Ann. The Semantics of Grammar// Studies in Language Companion Series, 18. i-vi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1988.

30. Wilkinson, Daniel Wong Gonzales. Split Infinitives across World Englishes. A Corpus-based Investigation, 2024, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wilkinson-Daniel-Wong-Gonzales/publication/311934084_Split_infinitives_across_World_Englishes_A_corpus-based_investigation/links/6128e734c69a4e48795fe0b1/Split-infinitives-across-World-Englishes-A-corpus-based-investigation.pdf?origin=publication_detail&form=MG0AV3 (Accessed November 19, 2024).


Review

For citations:


Kostanian Z.V. The Place of Independent Infinitive Structures in the System of English Sentences. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2025;11(1):28-42. https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2025-1-42-28-42

Views: 109


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2423 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3717 (Online)