The Intersection of Language and Class in Literature
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2025-3-44-114-123
Abstract
Literature serves as an auspicious material for revealing the intersection of language and class. The interplay of language and class in the upper-class characters, as portrayed in literature, has very subtle forms. Upper-class representatives stand out by literariness of their speech acquired in the elite universities and such obvious advantages of classical education as 1) knowledge of foreign languages, 2) skills of abstract and logical thinking, 3) proficiency in playing upon words, and 5) learning reflected in the use of allusions, which all together differentiate them from ‘out-group’ members and form their own sociolect. Knowledge of foreign languages is revealed in the use of borrowings, which imparts formality to speech and often performs the function of social characterization, distinguishing the upper-class representatives from those of other walks of life. Skills of abstract and logical thinking find their reflection in the use of abstract nouns and phrases, which, often being perceived as weird or alien, perform the function of social distancing or deflecting attention away from serious problems arising in society. The shibboleth reflected in the play upon words reveals the creativity, and often the ingenuity of the upper-class representatives in coining new words and phrases, and in charging the words with irony, mockery, and understatement, the most covert means of expressing attitude. The cultural backdrop includes allusions to the writers, books and theatrical performances, and the names of annual events, clubs, places, associations, etc. which translate their culture and mark upper-class speech.
About the Author
T. A. Ivushkina
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana Ivushkina, Doctor of Philology, is Head of English Department No. 3
76, Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Agha A. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2007. 427 p.
2. Aitchison J. Language Change: Progress or Decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 298 p.
3. Archer J. Not A Penny More, Not A Penny Less. St. Martin’s Paperbacks, 2004. 305 p.
4. Archer J. A Prisoner of Birth. Pan Books, 2008. 616 p.
5. Bernstein M. Identity Politics //Annual Review of Sociology, 2005, vol. 31. P. 47−74. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100054.
6. Bourdieu P. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991. 291 p.
7. Blommaert J. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2005. 299 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610295.
8. Bucholz M. Locating identity in language / M. Bucholz, K. Hall // Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. P. 18−28. DOI: 10.1515/9780748635788-006.
9. Caramelli N. Concrete and Abstract Nouns in School Age Children / N. Caramelli, A. Setti, D. Maurizzi // Psychology of Language and Communication, 2004, vol. 8, no. 2. P. 19−34.
10. Carter R. Seeing Through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing / R. Carter, W. Nash. B. Blackwell, 1990. 267 p.
11. Clark J.M. Dual Coding Theory and Education / J. M. Clark, A. Paivio // Educational Psychology Review, vol. 3, no. 3. P. 149−210.
12. Coupland N. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 2007. 209 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511755064.
13. Cravery B. The Age of Conversation. New York: New York Review Books, 2005. 488 p.
14. Crystal D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of English. Cambridge: Amazon Publishers, 2010.
15. Fellowes J. Past Imperfect. Phoenix, 2009. 516 p.
16. Fox K. Watching the English. The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. Hodder, 2004. 324 p.
17. Gumperz J.J. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. 225 p.
18. Joseph D.L. Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model / D. L. Joseph, D. A. Newman // Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, vol. 95, no. 1. P. 54–78. DOI: 10.1037/a0017286.
19. Halliday M.K. Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse / M. K. Halliday, J. Webster. London: Continuum, 2002. 301 p.
20. Heffer S. Strictly English: The Correct Way to Write and Why It Matters. Random House, 2010. 322 p.
21. Ishiguro K. The Remains of the Day. Faber & Faber, 1999. 258 p.
22. Ivushkina, T. Alluzivnye elementy v romanakh Past Imperfect Dzhuliana Fellowes i Rules and Civility Amora Towles v sotsiolingvisticheskom i sopostavitelnom aspektakh [Allusions in the novels Past Imperfect by Julian Fellowes and Rules and Civility by Amor Towles (in sociolinguistic and comparative aspects)]. Philology at MGIMO, 2019, no. 3 (19). P. 74−82. DOI: 10.24833/2410-2423-2019-3-19-74-82.
23. Ivushkina T. Literary Words of Foreign Origin as Social Markers in Jeffrey Archer’s Novels // Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2020, vol. 24, no. 4. P. 816−830. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-4-816-830.
24. Ivushkina T. Social Implications of Borrowings: British-American Parallels Through Literature //Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 2023, vol. 15, no. 3. P. 1−16. DOI:10.2478/ausp-2023-0024h.
25. Khokhlova N. Understanding of abstract noun in linguistic disciplines // Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, no. 136. P. 8−11. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.278.
26. Labov W. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular // Foundations of Language, 1975, vol. 13, no. 1. P. 95−118.
27. Milroy J. Historical description and the ideology of the standard language // The Development of Standard English, 1300−1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts / L. Wright ed. Cambridge: CUP, 2000. P. 11−28.
28. Nicholls D. One Day. Vintage Books, 2009. 435 p.
29. Nicholls D. Us. Hodder, 2020. 403 p.
30. Pierce C.S. Pierce on Signs. University of North Carolina Press, 1991. 284 p.
31. Renouf A. Shall we hors d’oeuvres? The Assimilation of Gallicisms into English // Lexique, Syntaxe et Lexique-Grammaire. Syntax, Lexis & Lexicon-Grammar: Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross. John Benjamins, 2004. DOI: 10.1075/lis.24.42ren.
32. Ross, A.S.C. Noblesse Oblige / A. S. C. Ross, N. Mitford, E. Waugh. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1956.
33. Sidnell, J. The Typology and Social Pragmatics of Interlocutor Reference in Southeast Asia / J. Sidnell, L. Fleming // The Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 3. P. 1−20. DOI: 10.47298/jala.v2-i3-a1.
34. Silverstein M. Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life // Language and Communication, 2003, vol. 23, no. 3−4. P. 193−229.
35. Schwanenflugel P.J. Context availability and the Development of Word Reading Skill // Journal of Literacy Research, 1996, vol. 28, no. 1. P. 35−54. DOI: 10.1080/10862969609547909.
36. Tejfel H. The achievement of inter-group differentiation // Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations / H. Tajfel ed. London: Academic Press, 1978. P. 77−100.
37. Townsend S. Number Ten. Penguin Books, 2012. 324 p.
38. Trudgill P. Standard and Non-Standard Dialects of English in the United Kingdom: Problems and Policies // International Journal of Sociology of Language, 1979, no. 21. P. 9–24. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1979.21.9.
39. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory / J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, et al. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987. 239 p.
40. Wodak R. Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1989. 288 p. DOI: 10.1075/ct.7.
Review
For citations:
Ivushkina T.A. The Intersection of Language and Class in Literature. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2025;11(3):114-123. https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2025-3-44-114-123
Views:
8
Email this article 