Preview

Linguistics & Polyglot Studies

Advanced search

LANGUAGE IN BIO-SOCIO-CULTURAL CONCEPTION: LEXICAL AND GRAMMAR “LEVELS”

Abstract

It has been an object of ongoing linguistic research to investigate the mechanisms of ‘generating’ words and word combinations in real speech, and defne their semantic status as lexico-grammatical units of language-as-a-system. Te article encourages the reader to look at the outlined problem from the bio-socio-cultural perspective on language as a domain of cognitive (biological and social) interactions between an individual and his/her environment. Te authors claim that the study of the lexical part of language should be different depending on whether words are analyzed in speech interactions (frstorder languaging) or in text (second-order language). Te meaning of a word is neither subjective (belongs to the reader only) nor objective (as part of the text only); it emerges every time anew from interactions of a perceiver with the perceived graphical sign which is an affordance for generating a particular hic et nunc contextual meaning. As for the grammatical part, it is asserted that the ‘generation’ of syntactical constructions is a biological ability of a human organism to renew and activate potential cognitive resources (‘storage’ of all the knowledge) which result from recursive (and recurrent) contingency with the language environment and which enable the organism to feel confdent of the success and effectiveness of adaptive acts in every new situation of the environment dynamics.

About the Authors

Andrey S. Druzhinin
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454

PhD in Linguistics, Senior Lecturer at English language Department № 1. Spheres of research: cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition, cognitive grammar.

 



Olga A. Karamalak
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

2 Building, 47/7 Bolshaya Ordinka, Moscow, 115184

PhD in Linguistics, Associate professor of Foreign Languages Department. Spheres of research and professional interest: cognitive linguistics, semantics, lexical prototypes, polysemy.



References

1. Arkhipov I. K. Vzaimodeistviye rechevogo povedeniya i sistemy yazyk: kak voznikayet yazyk na urovne rechi [On the interaction of communicative behavior and language stance: how language emerges from languaging] // Kognitivnyie issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive studies into language], ISS 12, 2012. pp. 489-500.

2. Arhipov I. K. Implicitnye i jeksplicitnye znachenija, ili paradoks obydennogo soznanija [Explicit and implicit meanings, a paradox as viewed by folk usage of a language] // Studia Linguistica. № XXII, 2013, pp. 5-10.

3. Bekhtereva N. P. O mozge cheloveka. Razmyshleniya o glavnom [On the human brain. Reflctions on the essentials]. SaintPetersburg, Notabene. 1994, 244 p.

4. Burlak S. A. Proishozhdenie jazyka: fakty, issledovanija, gipotezy [Origin of language: facts, research, hypotheses]. Moscow, Astrel’, Corpus. 2011, 464 p.

5. Verhoturova T. L. Faktor nabljudatelja v jazyke nauki [Factor of the observer in the language of science]. Irkutsk, Irkutskij gosudarstvennyj lingvisticheskij universitet [Irkutsk State Pedagogical University]. 2008, 290 p.

6. Vygotskij L. S. Myshlenie i rech’ [Thnking and speech]. Moscow, Labirint. 1934, 318 p.

7. Kapra F. Pautina zhizni. Novoe nauchnoe ponimanie zhivyh sistem. Per. s angl. pod red. V. G. Trilisa [Th web of life]. Kaliningrad, «Sofia»; Moscow, ID «Sofia». 2003. 336 p.

8. Kravchenko A. V. Ot jazykovogo mifa k biologicheskoj real’nosti: pereosmysljaja poznavatel’nye ustanovki jazykoznanija [From the language myth to biological reality: reconsidering the epistemic guidelines of linguistics]. Moscow, Rukopisnye pamjatniki Drevnej Rusi [Manuscipts of Ancient Rus]. 2003. 388 p.

9. Kravchenko A. V. Kognitivnyj gorizont jazykoznanija [Cognitive horizons of linguistics]. Irkutsk, Izdatel’stvo BGUJeP. 2008. 320 pp.

10. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznanija. Perevod s ang. Ju.A.Danilova [Tree of cognition. Transl. by Ju. Danilova]. Moscow, Progress-Tradicija. 2001. 224 p.

11. Mel’nichuk A. S. Metodologicheskie poiski v sovremennyh podhodah k issledovaniju jazyka [Methodological search in modern approaches to researching language]// Metodologicheskie osnovy novyh napravlenij v mirovom jazykoznanii [Methodological foundations of new trends in modern linguistics]. Kiev. 1992. P. 3 – 15.

12. Saussure F. de. Trudy po jazykoznaniju [Writings in General Linguistics] / Per. s franc. jaz. pod red. A. A. Holodovicha; Red. M. A. Oborina; Predisl. prof. N. S. Chemodanova [Trans;. by M. A. Oborina; Preface written by prof. N. S. Chemodanova]. Moscow, Progress. 1977. 696 p.

13. Stepanov Ju.S. V trehmernom prostranstve jazyka: semioticheskie problemy lingvistiki, fiosofi, iskusstva [In a three-dimensional space of language: semiotic issues of linguistics, philosophy and art]. Moscow, Nauka. 1985. 335 p.

14. Cowley S.J. Taking a language stance // Ecological Psychology. Vol. 23. ISS 3. 2011. pp. 5-25.

15. Frisina W. G. Th Unity of Knowledge and Action: Toward a nonrepresentational theory of knowledge. NY, SUNY Press. 2002. 280 p.

16. Gibson J. Th Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, Houghton-Miffi 1979. 332 p.

17. Jakendof R. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, MIT Press. 1983. 283 p.

18. Linell P. Dialogical Language, Dialogical Minds, Dialogical Brains // Language Sciences. Cambridge, Elsevier. № 27. 2007. P. 605–620.

19. Linell P. On the Nature of Language: Formal Written Language-Biased Linguistics vs. Dialogical Language Sciences / Cognitive Dynamics in Linguistic Interactions ed. by A. V. Kravchenko. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. P. 107-124.

20. Love N. Cognition and the Language Myth // Language Sciences. Cambridge, Elsevier. № 26. 2004. Р. 525-544.

21. Maturana H. R. Biology of language: Th epistemology of reality // Psychology and Biology of Language and Thught: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg by Miller, George A. and Elizabeth Lenneberg (eds.). New York, Academic Press. 1978. P. 27-63.

22. Maturana H. R. Reality: Th search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument // Th Irish Journal of Psychology. Vol. 9 (1). 1988. P. 25-82.

23. Reeke G.N., Edelman G.M. Real brains and artifiial intelligence // Daedalus. No. 117. 1988. P. 143–174.

24. Sinha C. Grounding, mapping, and acts of meaning. In Th Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. P. 223 – 255.

25. Thbault Paul J. First-Order Languaging Dynamics and Second-Order Language: Th Distributed Language View // Ecological Psychology. 23:3. 2011. P. 210-245.

26. Zlatev J. Meaning = Life (+ Culture): An outline of a unifid biocultural theory of meaning // Evolution of Communication. No 4 (2). 2003. pp. 1–37.


Review

For citations:


Druzhinin A.S., Karamalak O.A. LANGUAGE IN BIO-SOCIO-CULTURAL CONCEPTION: LEXICAL AND GRAMMAR “LEVELS”. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2017;4(12):5-14.

Views: 578


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2423 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3717 (Online)