Preview

Linguistics & Polyglot Studies

Advanced search

Factors of semiogenesis (philosophical and linguistic analysis)

https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2020-4-24-5-13

Abstract

The article deals with the philosophical and cognitive criteria of the evolution of the sign (semiogenesis), growing from signal to symbol and further to the sign in Language. The article aims to reveal not only differences among the three semiotic forms, but also their common and generic features. As a common philosophical criterion, to define generic feature of all evolutional semiotic forms and to explain the principle of the inner relationship between the form and the meaning in them, category of otherbeing (inobytié) is used. The cognitive analysis, which deals with the differential features of the evolutional semiotic entities, is developed on the base of the categories of identification and interpretation. The both functions, the identification and the interpretation, correlate with each other differently in signal, in symbol and in conventional sign of Language. The transition from one function to another characterizes the essence of the speech actualization of the sign in the process of semiosis. The only functional condition, that remains common and unchangeable in all kinds of sign, is the transition to the otherbeing. The otherbeing (whatever its functional perspective) represents the phenomenology of the sign in speech. The article may be interesting for the specialists in philosophy, semiotics and general linguistics.

About the Author

N. V. Ivanov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

Nicolay Viktorovitch Ivanov – Doctor in linguistics, Full Professor, Chief of Roman Languages Department

76, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 119454 Moscow



References

1. Barbaziuk, V.Yu. Smyslovoe razvitie metafory v textakh razlichnyh zhanrov: semioticheskiy I sinergeticheskiy aspekty interpretatsii [Semantic development of metaphor in texts of different genres: semiotic and synergetic aspects of interpretation]. – Dissertatsiia… kandidata filol. nauk. M., 2013. 180 s.

2. Bloomfield, L. Yazyk [Language]. M.: izd. “Progress”, 1968. 507 s.

3. Baudrillard, J. Symvolitcheskyi obmen i smert’ [Symbolic exchange and death]. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000. 387 s.

4. Werzbicka, A. Sravneniye – gradatsiia – metáfora [Comparison – gradation – metaphor] // Teoriia metafory (sbornik) [Theory of metaphor (collection)]. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 133-152.

5. Gadamer, H.G. Istina i Metod (osnovy philosophskoy germenevtiki) [Truth and method (basics of philosophical hermeneutics]. M.: Progress, 1988. 704 s.

6. Hegel, G.W.F. Nauka Logiki. [Science of Logic] // Entsyclopediia filosofskikh nauk. T.1. M.: Mysl’, 1974. 452 s.

7. Ivanov, N.V. Symvolitcheskaia funktsiia iazyka v aspektkah semiogeneza I semiosisa [Symbolic function of language in the aspects of semiogenesis and semiosis] Dissertatsiya na… doktora filol. nauk. M., 2002. 377 s.

8. Losev, A.F. Problema symvola I realistitcheskoye iskusstvo [The Problem of symbol and realistic art]. M.: Iskusstvo, 1976. 350 s.

9. Metchkovskaya, N.B. Semiotika: Iazyk. Priroda. Kultura (kurs lektsiy) [Semiotics: Language. Nature. Culture. (course of lectures)]. M.: izd. tsentr “Akademiya”, 2004. 432 s.

10. Potebnya, A.A. Iz lektsyi po teorii slovesnosti. Basnia. Poslovitsa. Pogovorka [From the lectures on philology. Fable. Proverb. Saying] // Potebnya A.A. Teoreticheskaya poetika [Potebnya A.A. – Theoretical poetics]. M.: Vysshaia shkola, 1990. S. 55-131.

11. Saussure, F. de. Kurs obshhey lingvistiki [The Course of general linguistics] // Saussure F. de. Trudy po iazykoznaniiu [Saussure F. Works of linguistics]. Moskva: Progress, 1977. P. 31–274.

12. Fedulova, M.N. Interpretatsionnaya priroda dikursa v sotsiokulturnom i kommunikativnom izmereniyah (na materiale angliyskikh i russkikh tekstov sudebnoy ritoriki) [The interpretational nature of discourse in sociocultural and communicative aspects (on the material of English and Russian texts of legal rhetorics]. M., 2020. 315 s.

13. Shklovskiy, V.B. O teorii prozy [On the theory of prose]. M.: Sovetskiy pisatel’, 1983. 383 s.

14. Shnyakina, K.V. Diskursuvnaia dinamika obraznykh form v iazyke i tekste (semiotitcheskiy analis angliyskikh i russkikh poslovits i metaphor) [Discourse dynamics of imaginative form in language and text (semiotic analysis of English and Russian proverbs and metaphors)] Dissertatsiia … kandidata filol. nauk, M., 2010. 163 s.

15. Peirce, Ch. S. Elements of Logic.// Collected papers. Vol. II. Cambridge (Mass): Harv. Univ. Press, 1965. 535 p.


Review

For citations:


Ivanov N.V. Factors of semiogenesis (philosophical and linguistic analysis). Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2020;6(4):5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2020-4-24-5-13

Views: 468


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2423 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3717 (Online)