PSEUDO-OMENS: BELIEVE THEM OR NOT?
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2018-4-16-106-113
Abstract
Omens are considered to be one of the ancient ways of coding everyday behavior, unquestioning observance of which guaranteed the archetypal person stability and well being in everyday life. Household omens fix the codification of everyday life, making them in the form of stable, well-structured models that have survived almost unchanged.
The aim of the work is to investigate the so–called “pseudo-omens”, which are the basis of the television series “Blind” (638 series), the specifics of their functioning in the time continuum. The presented paradigm of new omens explicates new properties and features of the ancient genre on the basis of system and non-system connections arising at the intersection of the main semantic coordinates. The author builds a special model type of omens, indicating an attempt to mythologize the consciousness of a modern man, because television as an effective means of suggestion blurs the line between reality and the fictional world. The results of more than 30 years study show that while meteorological and agricultural omens gradually turn into a passive reserve of the Russian language, household omens are actively used in different groups of the population. Among the arguments in favor of this conclusion, we can note the emergence of a significant number of scientific studies focused on the description of superstitions and the search for an answer to the following questions: why superstitions were created, why they are still used, why we believe in them. The material of the article allowed to formulate an explanation of the grounds for predicting the most likely causes of such a wide spread of household omens.
About the Author
Nailya N. FattakhovaRussian Federation
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
Nailya N. Fattakhova − Doctor of Philology, Professor of Department of Russian and Foreign Philology, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, (Kazan, Russia). Spheres of research and professional interest: syntax of modern Russian, Russian and comparative paremiology, methods of teaching Russian as a native, foreign and non-native.
References
1. Afanas’ev A.N. Narod-hudozhnik: Mif. Fol’klor. Literatura [People-artist: a Myth. Folklore. Literature]. M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1986. 368 s.
2. Bogorodicky V.A. Psihologiia poeticheskogo tvorchestva [Psychology of poetic creativity]. Kazan’: tipo-litografia Imperatorskogo Un-ta, 1900. 27s.
3. Dal’ V.I. Poslovitsy russkogo naroda [Progres of the Russian People]. Tom 3. SPb: TOO “Diamant”, 1996. 480 s.
4. Ermolov A.S. Narodnaia sel’skokhoziaistvennaia mudrost’ v poslovitsakh i pogovorkakh [Folk agricultural wisdom in proverbs and sayings.]. Spb., 1901-1905. T.4. 700 s.
5. Krushevskiy N.V. Zagovory kak vid russkoi narodnoi poezii [Conspiracies as a type of Russian folk poetry] // Varshavskie universitetskie izvestiia. Varshava, 1876. № 3. S. 3-69.
6. Mechkovskaia N.B. Semiotika: Iazyk. Priroda. Kul’tura [Semiotics: Language. Nature. Culture]: kurs lektsiy: Ucheb. posobie. M.: Izdatel’skii centr «Akademiia», 2004. 432 s.
7. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovy slovar’ russkogo iazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. 994 s.
8. Pankeev I. Tainy russkikh sueverii [Secrets of the Russian superstitions]. M.: Yauza, 1997. 200 s.
9. Permyakov G.L. Osnovy strukturnoi paremiologii [Fundamentals of structural paremiology.]. M.: Nauka, 1988. 236 s.
10. Potebnia A.A. . Mysl’ i iazyk [Tought and language.]. Har’kov: tip. «Mirny trud», 1913. 225 s.
11. Tolstoi L.N. Voina i mir [War and peace]. M.: Ogiz, 1945. 686 s.
12. Fattahova N.N., Kul’kova M.A. Narodnye primety v raznostrukturnykh iazykakh [Folk omens in structurally different languages]: monografia. M.: FLINTA : Nauka, 2013. 252 s.
13. Fattahova N.N. Semantika al’ternativnoi motivatsii v narodnykh primetakh [Semantics of alternative motivation in folk superstitions] // Filologiia i kul’tura. Philology and culture. 2015, № 2. S. 122-127.
14. KHarchenko V.K. Iazyk narodnoi primety [Te Language of folk omens] // Russkii iazyk v shkole. M., 1992. № 1. S. 78-82.
15. Civ’yan T.V. Mifologicheskoe programmirovanie povsednevnoi zhizni [Mythological programming of everyday life] // Etnicheskie stereotipy povedeniia. L.: Nauka, 1985. S. 154-178.
16. Cheremisina M.I., Kolosova T.A. Ocherki po teorii slozhnogo predlozheniia [Essays on the theory of complex sentences]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1987. 197 s.
17. Lepori Gabriele, Dark Omens in the Sky: Do Superstitious Beliefs Affect Investment Decisions? Data obnovleniia 08.06.2009 URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1428792 (data obrashcheniia 01.11.1017).
Review
For citations:
Fattakhova N.N. PSEUDO-OMENS: BELIEVE THEM OR NOT? Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2018;4(16):106-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2018-4-16-106-113