PERCEPTION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE: COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC DIMENSION
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2018-3-15-14-24
Abstract
Political discourse abounds with political meanings, manifest and hidden ideological preferences, has a national-cultural coloring. Such features of political discourse make its perception largely subjective and individual.On the other hand, language as a means of communication has a dual nature − an expression plane and a content plane. The latter in the form of lexical, grammatical, stylistic meanings, which are present in a person’s linguistic consciousness, is that essential, ontological basis that allows language in the process of speech communication to form the invariant basis of the pragmatic functional of the text which is independent of the subjective-individual features of the its perception.
Communicative-semantic and pragmatic modeling can be an effective tool of exploring the tangible, language basis of the pragmatic dimension of the text excluding its connection with the peculiarities of subjective and individual perception.
Semantic modeling shows the result of selection and inclusion of informative, descriptive and other semantic data in the text.
Semantic-communicative modeling is realized in the form of the semantic-communicative model based on the size of a lexico-semantic field and the semantic-communicative model based on the frequency weight of such a field. These models make it possible to identify the illocutionary stance of the text and measure it in words and frequency characteristics and determine the main communicative-pragmatic explicators of the text.
The functional and pragmatic perspective of the text is based on the pragmatic explicators of the text, semantic (contextual) fields into which they are embedded, and the compositional structure of the text.
About the Author
Nikolay I. Klimovich
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
Nikolay I. Klimovich − Candidate of Science (Linguistics), Associate Professor, Merited Fellow of Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor, English Department № 6, MGIMO-University under the MFA of Russia. Spheres of research and professional interest: linguistics, theory and practice of interpretation and translation, foreign language instruction.
References
1. Klimovich N.I. Sopostavitel’noe statisticheskoe i semanticheskoe modelirovanie voennogo teksta: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.20 [Comparative statistical and semantic modeling of the military text. Summary of candidate of phil. sci. degree diss.]. Moscow, 1987, 21 p.
2. Klimovich N.I. Kontekstual’no-pragmaticheskoe izmerenie informatsionno-mediinogo diskursa [Contextual-Pragmatic Dimension of the Information-Media Discourse]. Iazyki i kul’tury − Languages and Cultures. Moscow, MGIMO (U), 2013. P. 84-90.
3. Ponomarenko E.V. Pragmaticheskoe vozdeistvie kak bazovaia funktsiia angliiskogo delovogo diskursa [Pragmatic impact as basic function of English business discourse]. Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO [Philological sciences in MGIMO], 2017, no. 12, pp.55-63.
4. Khramchenko D.S. Ironiia i iumor kak diskursivnye mekhanizmy pragmaticheskogo vozdeistviia (na materiale angloiazychnykh delovykh publikatsii SMI) [Irony and humor as discursive mechanisms of pragmatic impact (based on business articles in mass media]. Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO [Philological Sciences in MGIMO], 2017, no. 12, pp. 70-75.
5. Carreon, Jonathan Rante; Svetanant, Chavalin. (2017). What Lies Underneath a Political Speech?: Critical Discourse Analysis of Thai PM’s Political Speeches Aired on the TV Programme Returning Happiness to the People. De Gruyter Open: Open Linguistics; 3: 638–655.
6. Cribb, V. Michael; Rochford, Shivani. (2018). The Transcription and Representation of Spoken Political Discourse in the UK House of Commons. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 8, No. 2; p. 1-14.
7. Deroey, Katrien.(2017) Markers of lesser importance in lecture discourse. University of Luxembourg, Open Repository and Bibliography Retrieved 28 December, 2017 from http://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/33179/1/Deroey%202017%20Markers%20of%20lesser%20importance%20CAAD.pdf
8. Horn, L. and Kecskes, I. (2013). Pragmatics, Discourse, and cognition. Yale University. P.355-375 Retrieved 12.01 2018 from: https://www.albany.edu/faculty/ikecskes/files/Horn%20and%20Kecskes%2065-45-R1026-Horn.pdf
9. Mengyu He, Hajar Abdul Rahim. Exploring Implicit Metadiscourse in Legal Discourse. An Analysis of the Chinese and American Constitutions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 7 No. 2, 2017, pp. 391-40.
10. Olaluwoye, Layo Language and Ideology in Discourses on Gender Relations in The Guardian and Vanguard Newspapers. Agogo: Journal Of Humanities, Vol. 3, 2017, p 32-40.
11. Van Dijk, Teun A. News, Discourse and Ideology. Handbook of Journalism Studies. Thomasz Hanitzsch & Karin Wahl-Jorgensen (Eds.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2008. p. 191-204.
12. Van Dijk, Teun A. Critical Discourse Analysis (new version). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Second Edition. D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), 2 vols. (vol. 1, pp. 466-485). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.
Review
For citations:
Klimovich N.I. PERCEPTION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE: COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC DIMENSION. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2018;3(15):14-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2018-3-15-14-24
Views:
716
Email this article 