DECLARATIVE AND MANIPULATIVE MEANS OF INFLUENCING THE ADDRESSEE THROUGH THE OPPOSITION “WE-THEY” IN THE POLITICAL TEXT
Abstract
Te article is devoted to the problem of means and ways of exerting influence on the reader. Mass media does it through its interpretation of the covered events. Te character and the mode of interpretation depend on the stance of the author in the broad meaning of the word. Any political text is based on the archetypical opposition “we-they”, “ours-theirs” which with centuries has become cultural dominant feature thus creating contradiction. Any controversy presupposes use of weapons. Mass media uses its effective weapons of declarative and manipulative devices which affect the addressee and change their behaviour. Declarative devices are expressed verbally thus being more explicit. So they aim at “we”, “ours”. Manipulative devices are implied rather than expressed openly, since manipulation means an intentional and covert way of making the addressee act according to the will of the addresser. Te article looks at several manipulative devices concentrating mainly on an alternative situation whose problem cannot be solved. Te article analyses two types of division: differentiation which is defned as a phenomenon of segregation foregrounding the opposition “we-others”; and contrast which introduces controversy and confrontation with the opposition “we-enemy”. Te given analysis of manipulative devices seems actual especially in the context of teaching foreign affairs department students to work with political texts as such and comprehend the complexity of the global political situation.
About the Author
N. A. LevkovskayaRussian Federation
76, Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
Nina A. Levkovskaya - PhD, Professor of English Department №1. Spheres of research and professional interest: text linguistics, English stylistics, text pragmatics, mass media language, political discourse.
References
1. Alieva T.V. Iazykovye sredstva realizatsii kontseptual’noi oppozitsii «svoi-chuzhoi» v Britanskom politicheskom diskurse (Language Means of Realization of the Conceptual Opposition “WE-Thy” in the British Political Discourse”). Kand. diss. Moskva, 2012. 201 s.
2. Belyaevskaja E.G. Kognitivnije parametry stilja (Cognitive Parameters of Style) // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiky (Aspects of Cognitive Lingvistics). 2010, №1. С. 22-29.
3. Levkovskaya N.A. Pragmaticheskaja integratsija: sootnoshenije verbalnykh i vizualnykh komponentov politicheskogo diskursa kak factor ideologicheskogo vozdejstvija (Pragmatic Integration: Correlation of Verbal and Visual Components of Political Discourse as Factor of Ideological Inflence) // Magija INNO: novoje v issledovanii jazyka i metodike jego prepodavanija (Magic of INNO: New in Language Research and Methods of Teaching). Conference collected papers. M., 2015, MGIMO. P. 677-684.
4. Solovej Valerij. Absoljutnoye oruzhije. Osnovy psikhologicheskoj vojny i manipulirovanija (Absolute Weapon. Th Basics of Psychological War and Manipulating) // Izdatelstvo «Э». M., 2017. 320 p.
5. Stepanov J.A. Konstanty. Slovar russkoj kultury. Opyt issledovanija (Th Constant. Russian Culture Dictionary. Th Research Experience) // Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury. 1997. 329 p.
6. Entsiklopedija “Russkij Jazyk” (Encyclopedia “Th Russian Language”). M., 2003. 704 p.
7. Th Economist. November 29-December 5 2014. C. 24-26
Review
For citations:
Levkovskaya N.A. DECLARATIVE AND MANIPULATIVE MEANS OF INFLUENCING THE ADDRESSEE THROUGH THE OPPOSITION “WE-THEY” IN THE POLITICAL TEXT. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2017;4(12):30-35. (In Russ.)