PECULIARITIES OF TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETATION OF LACUNAS IN THE UN DISCOURSE
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2019-1-17-55-62
Abstract
Te article reviews the peculiarities of translation and interpretation of lacunas in the UN discourse and enumerates methods of their elimination in line with the UN discourse restrictions. Te article offers recommendations and practical advice to interpreters and translators. It highlights the connection between lacunas, terms, professionalisms, neologisms and loanwords in the UN discourse. Te article provides a classifcation of UN lacunas and the ways of eliminating them. Te research is conducted within the classical theory of translation. Te paper concludes that the peculiarities of the UN discourse defne the specifc features of UN lacunas and methods of their elimination in translation. Te paper discovers the most widely-spread types of lacunas, the most and the least popular methods of their translation. Te fndings may become the foundation for further research of the UN discourse, text translation problems, as well as studying lacunas in general. Te research may be of use to students, interpreters and translators, and teachers.
About the Authors
О. A. EgorovaRussian Federation
Olga A. Egorova – PhD in Linguistics, Senior Lecturer at English Language Department No.1
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
A. A. Pogonina
Russian Federation
Alina A. Pogonina – second-year student at the Master’s programme “Training Translators and Interpreters for International Organizations”
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Barkudarov L.S. Yazyk y perevod [Language and translation]. M.: 1975, 240 p.
2. Vlakhov S.I., Florin S.P. Neperevodimoe v perevode [Te untranslatable in translation]. M.: R.Valent, 2006. 448 p.
3. Dzens N.I., Perevyshina I.R., Koshkarov V.A. Teoria y praktika perevoda [Teory and practice of translation] S. Petersburg, 2007. 559 p.
4. Komissarov V.N. Sovremennoe perevodovedenie: kurs lektsy [Modern translation science: lecture course]. M.: Izdatelstvo Panina, 2006. 192 p.
5. Markovina I.Y., Sorokin Y.A. Kultura y tekst. Vvedenie v lakunologiiu [Culture and text. Te Introduction to lacunology]. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2008. 144 p.
6. Volkova T.A. Diskursivnokommunikativny podkhod k modelirovaniiu protsessa perevoda [Discourse-communicative approach to translation models]. Izvestia VGPU, 2011. No.5. P.51-54.
7. Ermolovich G.D. Nash perevod, vpered leti! V lakune ostanovka [On, my translation! But beware lacunas]. URL: www.yermolovich.ru/lakunaunabridged.pdf
8. Nesterova Y.A., Chernukha T.V. Termin y terminologiia. Politicheskaia leksika [Terms and terminology. Lexis of politics]. Izvestiia TulGU. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2008. No.2, P.226-236.
9. Pitina S.A. Kognitivnaia lingvistika y smezhnye lingvisticheskie nauki o vzaimodeistvii iazika y mishleniia [Cognitive linguistics and related linguistics sciences on the relation between language and reason] // Vestnik ChSU. 2013. No.24 (315) P.35-37.
10. Popova T.G., Taratynova N.V. Politichesky tekst y ego leksicheskie osobennosti [Political text and its lexical peculiarities]. Rhema, 2012. No.3, P. 90-97.
11. Serdobintseva E.N. Professionalismy v sisteme spetsialnoi leksiki y sisteme natsionalnogo iazyka [Professional words in the system of specialized lexis and national language]. Izvestiia PGU, 2012. No.27, P.396-401.
12. Firstov M.S. Oratorsky giperstil v sisteme functsionalnykh stiley [Orator’s hyperstyle in the system of functional styles]. Vestnik MSLU, 2014. No.8 (694). P.89-97.
13. Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaia lingvistika [Political linguistics]. M.: 2006. 254 p.
14. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
Review
For citations:
Egorova О.A., Pogonina A.A. PECULIARITIES OF TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETATION OF LACUNAS IN THE UN DISCOURSE. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2019;17(1):55-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2019-1-17-55-62