TYPES OF DIALOGISM IN FRENCH NEWSPAPER DISCOURSE
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2019-4-20-56-62
Abstract
The article examines types of dialogism in French newspaper discourse and determines factors that cause dialogism in discourse and lingua-pragmatic forms of realization of its types. These factors are communicative situation and intertextuality. A communicative situation underlies two types of dialogism: the interactional dialogism, which is a speech interaction between a text author and its reader, and the interlocutive dialogism, which is the interaction of speech actors within the interview genre. Intertextuality in the form of quotations in media texts and/or text headlines creates transtextual dialogism, represented by its two forms: intertextual dialogism (speech interaction between a text author and a quotation author) and paratextual dialogism (authorization of a quotation included into the text headline by a text author). The first two types of dialogism and intertextual dialogism are characteristic of various discourse types, whereas paratextual dialogism is a distinctive feature of newspaper discourse. For discourse analysis there were selected texts of various genres from printed and electronic versions of French national and regional newspapers such as Le Monde, Le Figaro, Libération, Le Parisien and Nice-Matin.
About the Authors
M. V. Tarasova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria V. Tarasova – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, French Department
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia
M. K. Ogorodov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail K. Ogorodov – PhD in Philology, Head of the French Department
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia
M. L. Petrova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria L. Petrova – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, French Department
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia
References
1. Arnold I.V. Intertekstualnost – poetika chuzhogo slova [Intertextuality as The Poetics of Someone Else’s Word] // Semantika. Stilistika. Intertekstualnost: Сб. ст. / nauch. red P.E. Bukharkin. SPb, 1999. 444 s.
2. Barthes R. Izbrannye trudy: Semiotika, Poetika [Selected Works: Semiotics, Poetics] / Per. s fr. М.: Progress, 1989. 616 s.
3. Bakhtin M.M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics] // Bakhtin M.M. Sobr. soch. v 7 t. М.: Russkie slovari: Iazyki slavianskoi kultury, 2002. Т. 6. s. 7-300, 466-505.
4. Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin: slovo, dialog, roman [Bakhtin: Word, Dialogue, Novel] // Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki / Per. s fr. М.: Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopedia (ROSSPEN), 2004. 656 s.
5. Adam J.-M. Unités rédactionnelles et genres discursifs : cadre général pour une approche de la presse écrite // Pratiques, n° 94, Genres de la presse écrite, 1997. P. 3-18.
6. Genette G. Introduction à l’architexte. Paris: Le Seuil, 1979. 96 p.
7. Genette G. Palimpsestes : la littérature au second degré. Paris: Le Seuil, 1982. 486 p.
8. Maingueneau, D. Analyser les textes de communication. Paris: Nathan/ VUEF, 2002. 211 p.
9. Samoyault, Т. L’intertextualité. Mémoire de la littérature. Paris: Armand Colin, 2005. 127 p.
Review
For citations:
Tarasova M.V., Ogorodov M.K., Petrova M.L. TYPES OF DIALOGISM IN FRENCH NEWSPAPER DISCOURSE. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2019;20(4):56-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2019-4-20-56-62
Views:
762
Email this article 