Preview

Linguistics & Polyglot Studies

Advanced search

Towards the Issue of the Smallest Theatrical text Unit

https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-1-25-91-99

Abstract

This research aims to identify the smallest unit of theatrical text as a specific polyphonic sign system from the point of view of the apparatus that governs it. The initial difficulty, which arises in connection with theatrical text, is the issue of a theatrical sign. The author considers different approaches targeted to synthesize the definition of the smallest unit, which is required for the scientific description of the object under analysis. It is pointed out that any disregard of a polymodal nature of theatrical text leads to invalid results. Theatrical text as a direct result of complex sign semiosis should be regarded holistically. It is important to realize that any speech event in the theater is performative and applied in an equivalent theatrical sign (acteme), which is the result of polyvalent sign systems on the stage. The term ‘acteme’ applied for theatrical signs, as it is assumed, can facilitate the process of linguistic description of theatrical text and its reading. It is pointed out that although the issue of theatrical text is less elaborated in language theory than the issue of dramatic text as a literary work, it is evident that investigations in this field have considerably progressed and the search for an adequate comprehension of semiotic procedures continues.

About the Author

O. А. Chureyeva
V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

 Olga А. Chureyeva – PhD candidate, Senior Lecturer of the Russian Language Department, Medical Academy named after S. I. Georgievsky 

95007, Simferopol, Academician Vernadsky Avenue, 4



References

1. Berliand, I. E. Igra kak fenomen soznaniia [Play as phenomenon of mind]. Kemerovo: Аlef, 1992, pp.17-23.

2. Ilova, E. V. Aktualizatsiia aktem v diskursivno-semioticheskom prostranstve tetralnoi kommunikatsii [Actualization of actemes in discursive-semiotic space of theatral communication]. Aktual’nye problemy filologii i pedagogiceskoi lingvistiki [Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics], 2017, no. 3, рр. 54-64.

3. Kubriakova, E. S. O tekste i kriteriiakh ego opredeleniia [About the text and criteria of its definition] // Tekst. Struktura i semantika [Text. Structure and semantics]. vol. 1. М., 2001. pp. 72-81.

4. Lotman, Ju. M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta [The structure of a artistic text. Analysis of a poetic text]. Sankt-Peterburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Аttikus, 2018. 704 p.

5. Mikhailova, A. A. Obraz spektaklia [Image of the performance]. М.: Iskusstvo, 1978. 247 p.

6. Pavis, P. Slovar’ teatra [Dictionary of the Theatre]. M.: Izd-vo «GITIS», 2003. 516 p.

7. Saussure, F. Kurs obshchei lingvistiki [Course in General Linguistics] // Sossyur, F. de. Trudy po iazykoznaniiu. M.: Progress, 1977. 696 p.

8. Tsunskiy, N. V. Teatral’naia germenevtika i analiz teatral’nogo teksta [Theatrical hermeneutics and analysis of the theatrical text] // ONS. 2000. no. 3. pp. 161-171.

9. El’konin, D. B. Psikhologiia igry [Psychology of play]. М., 1978. 304 p.

10. Jubersfel’d, A. Chitat’ teatr [To read the theatre] // Kak vsegda ob avangarde: Antologija francuzskogo teatral’nogo avangarda [As always about vanguard: ontology of French theatrical vanguard]. M.: TPF Sojuzteatr, 1992, 288 p.

11. Kowzan, T. Litterature et Spectacle. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 1975. 172 p.

12. Mukařovsky, J. Umĕni jako sémiologický fact. Studie I. Brno: Host, 2000. pp. 208-214.

13. Rozik, E. The homogeneous nature of the theatre medium. In Semiotica. 168-1/4, 2008. pp. 169-190.


Review

For citations:


Chureyeva O.А. Towards the Issue of the Smallest Theatrical text Unit. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2021;7(1):91-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-1-25-91-99

Views: 901


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2423 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3717 (Online)