Aesthetic perception of the Russian sound speech by Germans (a case study of German internet forums)

The article is devoted to the aesthtic assessment of the sound of Russian speech as reflected in German Internet forums. Segmental and suprasegmental features of Russian pronunciation which evoke in native speakers of German empathy and / or antipathy towards Russian sounding speech, are described. The ordinary Germans' naive assessment of Russian souding speech differs from that by professional linguists. Germans who are not familiar with the theoretical basis of the phonetic structure of the Russian language pay attention, first of all, to those pronunciation features that are not characteristic of the phonetic basis of the German language. Among them on segmental level are the following: trembling sonant [r̥], vowel [ᵻ] and back-lingual slit [ɣ] after vowels [e], [i] and consonants [lʲ], [nʲ], [j], the pronunciation of which in German in this position is pronounced as ich-Laut [ç]. The Germans also seem to dislike clusters of consonants that are absent in the German language, for example, -рск-, -здр- etc. The presence of these sounds in the Russian language allows ordinary Germans to characterize Russian sounding speech as rude, despite the remarks of the Germans that there are many “soft” sounds i.e. palatalized consonants in the Russian language. The main difference at the suprasegmental level, which in the scientific literature is designated as the opposition of the German “staccato” and Russian “legato”, finds its confirmation in the statements of German members of the forum. The rhythmic organization of Russian speech is assessed by common Germans as discordant and indistinct, since, unlike German speech, Russian speech is characterized by relaxed articulation, non-forced vocalization, an extended melodic range and an irregular rhythmic patterns. In addition, the use of different pitch movements in friendly and aggressive communication encourages Germans to qualify the speech of Russian speakers in obvious situations of friendly communication as confrontational.

1. Velichkova, L. V. Psikholingvisticheskaia osnova issledovaniia emotsional'nosti zvuchashchei rechi [Psycholinguistic basis for the study of emotionality of sounding speech] / L.V. Velichkova // Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2007. №5. S. 20-27.

2. Glushak, V. M. Rol' emotsii v strukture rechepovedencheskikh modusov / V.M. Glushak [The role of emotion in the structure of speech behavior modus] // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaia kommunikatsiia. 2006. № 2. S. 50-57.

3. Nikolaeva, T. M. Intonatsiia slozhnogo predlozheniia v slavianskikh iazykakh [Intonation of a complex sentence in Slavic languages] / T.M. Nikolaeva. M.: Nauka, 1969. 286 s.

4. Pospelova, S. N. Auditivny analiz spontannoy zvuchashchei detskoi rechi s ispol'zovaniem kataloga prosodicheskikh priznakov [Auditive analysis of a spontaneous children’s speech by means of a catalogue of prosodic features] / S.N. Pospelova // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaia kommunikatsiia. 2018. № 4. S. 88-93.

5. Potapova, R. K., Potapov, V. V. Iazyk, rech', lichnost' [Language, speech, personality] / R.K. Potapova, V.V. Potapov. M: Iazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2006. 496 s.

6. Rogova M. K. Sopostavlenie foneticheskikh sistem nemetskogo i russkogo iazykov [Comparasion of phonetic systems of German and Russian]/ M.K. Rogova // Russkii iazyk za rubezhom. 1979. №1(57). S. 18-23.

7. Bose, I. Doch da sin ja' nur muster: Kindlicher Sprechausdruck im sozialen Rollenspiel / I. Bose. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2003. 438 S.

8. Aktuelle Spracheinstellungen in Deutschland: erste Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Repräsentativumfrage / L.M. Eichinger, A.-K. Gärtig, A. Plewnia u.a. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, 2009. 63 S.

9. Stock, E. Wirkungen des Stimm- und Sprechausdrucks / E. Stock // Sprechwirkung: Grundfragen, Methoden und Ergebnisse ihrer Erforschung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1991. S. 59-142.

10. Trojan, F. Biophonetik / F. Trojan. Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut AG, 1975. 264 S.