Preview

MGIMO Journal of Language Research and Teaching

Advanced search

Violation of the Principles of Communication Ecology: Pragmatics of Spanish Portrait Interview

https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2026-1-46-55-72

Abstract

Public media discourse is the most important communicative environment in modern society. The processes taking place within it are most clearly manifested in the genre of portrait interviews, the purpose of which is to present a personality through deep interaction and the construction of a public image. Achieving this goal is possible in a specially constructed communicative environment based on respect for personal boundaries and the principles of harmonious interaction. This approach corresponds to the concept of communication ecology, which, however, has not yet been formed as a coherent theory. Its principles are derived in the article through a synthesis of a number of psychological and linguistic theories that focus on harmonious interaction.

The analysis of Spanish portrait interviews reveals a culturally specific paradox: systematic violations of the principles of communication ecology (provocation, manipulation, pressure) do not lead to communication failure, but are a distinctive feature of the genre.

The aim of this article is to identify and describe the strategies and tactics of such violations in the speech behaviour of Spanish interviewers and to determine their pragmatic specificity in Spanish linguistic culture. The study is based on the hypothesis that these violations are not a communicative failure, but a culturally conditioned mechanism that serves the deeper purpose of the genre – to create a vivid public “portrait” of a person.

The work applies pragmalinguistic analysis, implemented within a two-level model. At the first level, based on a synthesis of psychological and linguistic approaches, deviations from the principles of ecological communication are identified. At the second, interpretative level, the concept of alterocentricity in the Spanish language (W. Bainehauer), the model of communication as a “joint dance” (U. Maturana) and existential philosophy (J. Ortega y Gasset) are used to explain these deviations.

It has been established that strategies and tactics for disrupting the ecology of communication are used as a tool for engaging the interlocutor in dialogue, testing their personality and self-disclosure.

The conclusions are important for the theory of intercultural communication and pragmatics, as they demonstrate the cultural conditioning of communicative norms and contribute to the understanding of the specifics of Spanish media discourse.

About the Author

O. V. Sidarevich-Stakhnova
Belarusian State University
Belarus

Olga Sidarevich-Stakhnova, PhD, is Assistant Professor at Department of Romance and Germanic Languages for International Professional Activities; Post-PhD Researcher, Department of Speech Studies and Communication Theory, Belarusian State University of Foreign Languages

4, Nezavisimosti Avenue, Minsk, 220030



References

1. Bern, E. Transaktnyj analiz v psikhologii: sistemnaia individualnaia i sotsialnaia psikhoterapiia [Transactional anályses in psychotherapy: a systematic individual and social psychiatry]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy prospekt, 2024. 352p.

2. Boyko, V.V. Energiia emotsiy v obshchenii: vzgliad na sebia i na drugikh [The energy of emotions in communication: a look at yourself and others]. Moscow, Filin, 1996. 472 p.

3. Borisova, I.N. Russkiy razgovornyy dialog: struktura i dinamika. Moscow, Izd. KD «LIBROKOM», 2009. 320 p.

4. Buryakovskaya, V.A. Strategii destruktivnogo kommunikativnogo povedeniia [Strategies of destructive communication behavior]. Kommunikativnye issledovaniia, 2019, vol. 6, no. 3. P. 620–629. DOI: 10.25513/2413-6182.2019.6(3).620-629.

5. Vechkina, O.V. Narushenie eticheskikh norm kak odna iz prichin kommunikativnykh neudach v obshchenii [Violation of ethical standards as one of the reasons for communication failures in communication]. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser.: Filologiia. Zhurnalistika, 2010, vol. 10, issue. 2. P. 14−17.

6. Grice, G.P. Logika i rechevoe obshchenie [Logic and Conversation]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike: [A Collection of Papers], issue. 16: Lingvisticheskaia pragmatika. Moscow, 1985. P. 217–237.

7. Issers, O.S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communication strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. 9th edition. Moscow: LENAND, 2024. 320 p.

8. Komalova, L.R. Mezhlichnostnaia kommunikatsiia: ot konflikta k konsensusu: Monografiia [Interpersonal communication: from conflict to consensus: Monograph] / E.B. Yakovleva ed. M.: RAN. INION. Tsentr gumanit. nauch.-inform. issled. Otd. iazykoznaniia, 2016. 180 p.

9. Larionova, M.V. Svoy sredi chuzhikh, chuzhoy sredi svoikh: o latinoamerikanskoy identichnosti skvoz prizmu etnonimov latinoamericano/latin, hispanic [One of “us” among “strangers”, a “stranger” among “us”: on Latin American identity through the prism of the ethnonyms latinoamericano/latin, hispanic]. Iberoamerikanskiye tetradi, 2025, vol. 13, no. 3. P. 39–63. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-3-39-63.

10. Maturana, U. Drevo poznaniia [Tree of knowledge] / U. Maturana, F. Varela; per. s angl. Yu. A. Danilova, https://avidreaders.ru/download/drevo-poznaniya-1.html?f=fb2. (accessed 12 December 2025).

11. Poplavskaya, T.V. Trolling kak tekhnologiia samoprezentatsii [Trolling as a technology of self-presentation]. Terra Linguistica, 2024, vol. 15, no. 2. P. 102−110. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.15210.

12. Rozenberg, M. Iazyk zhizni. Nenasilstvennoe obshchenie [Nonviolent communication: the language of life]. Moscow, Sofiia, 2022. 288 p.

13. Sidorevich-Stakhnova, O.V. Ekologiia obshcheniia, etika, kooperatsiia. K postanovke problemy [Ecology of communication, ethics, cooperation. To the problem statement]. Vestnik MGLU. Ser.: 1. Filologiia, 2023, no. 5 (126). P. 76–85.

14. Solodovnikova, N.G. Nulla dies sine linea kak osnovnoy printsip raboty V.I. Shakhovskogo [Nulla dies sine linea as a basic principle of V. I. Shakhovsky’s work]. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser.: Filologicheskie nauki, 2022, vol. 166, no. 3. P.233−236.

15. Shakhovskiy, V.I. Triada ekologii – chelovek, yazyk, emotsii – v sovremennoy kommunikativnoy praktike (monografiia) [The triad of ecologies – man, language, emotions – in modern communication practice (monograph)]. Volgograd: Izd-vo VGSPU «Peremena», 2017. 358 p.

16. Beinhauer, W. El español coloquial. 2. ed. corregida, aumentada y actualizada. Madrid: Gredos. 1968. 359 p.

17. Brown, P. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage / P. Brown, S. Levinson. Cambridge Univ. Press. 1987. 345 p.

18. Flor, V. Once para miles. Fútbol, poder e identidades colectivas en España (1900-2020). Sociología histórica. Fiesta y ritual: las continuas metamorfosis de lo invariable, 2021, vol. 11, núm. 1. P. 172-206.

19. Goffman, E. On face work. Interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior. London. 1972. P. 5–45.

20. Haeckel, E. Ökologie und Chorologie. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Relmer. 1866. P. 286– 289.

21. Ortega y Gasset, J. Meditaciones del Quijote. Publicaciones de la residencia de estudiantes. Serie II. vol. I. Madrid. 1914. 226 p.

22. Rivera Vicente, G. El fútbol como motor y reflejo del nacionalismo en España: Un estudio del FC Barcelona y el Real Madrid desde el franquismo hasta la actualidad. Revista [in]genios, 2024, vol. 11, núm. 1.


Review

For citations:


Sidarevich-Stakhnova O.V. Violation of the Principles of Communication Ecology: Pragmatics of Spanish Portrait Interview. MGIMO Journal of Language Research and Teaching. 2026;12(1):55-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2026-1-46-55-72

Views: 264

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2423 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3717 (Online)