X-PHEMISMS AS NON-LINEAR PHENOMENA
https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2020-2-22-53
Abstract
The present paper aims to define the status of x-phemisms as dynamic phenomena. A detailed analysis of the research data taken from English socio-political discourse presented in a range of English-language news sources, such as The Guardian, The Seattle Times, ABC News, The New York Times, English media discourse and dictionaries of Contemporary English has been carried out. The paper finds that x-phemisms are non-linear phenomena. Thus, when distinguishing between euphemisms, dyspemisms and orthopemisms one should take into consideration diachronic meaning change, the previous context, the current context, intention, subject-object relationship. For instance, in particular contexts ethnic pejorative words irrespective of their negative meaning can perform a function of either euphemisms or dysphemisms, which depends on the feelings of similarity or distinction generated by ethnic boundaries and experienced by the speaker. The paper reveals that an ethnic pejorative word is dysphemistic once it refers to the ethnic group the speaker doesn’t belong to, but becomes euphemistic once applied to one’s own ethnic group. This illustrates contextual and pragmatic nature of x-phemisms. The proposed approach to the study of x-phemisms has several empirical and theoretical implications for further research on these phenomena.
About the Authors
T. A. Fomina
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana A. Fomina – Lecturer at English Language Department No. 1. Spheres of research and professional interest: cognitive linguistics, experiential linguistics, political discourse analysis.
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
T. V. Alieva
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Alieva – PhD, Associate Professor at English Language Department No. 1. Spheres of research and professional interest: cognitive linguistics, political discourse analysis.
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Deik T.A. van. Iazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiia [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 312 pp.
2. Druzhinin A.S. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie osobennosti kontrafaktivnykh grammaticheskikh konstruktsii v amerikanskom predvybornom diskurse 2000-2012 gg. [The cognitive and pragmatic features of the functioning of the Subjunctive (counterfactual) forms in English (the case study of American election discourse)]. Thesis for PhD in Philological sciences. Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2014. 181 pp.
3. Zarochentseva A.S. Lingvokognitivnye i pragmaticheskie aspekty modelirovaniia sobytii tipa “mezhdunarodnyi konflikt” (na primere osveshheniia osvobozhdeniia gorodov Mosul i Aleppo v 2016 godu) v “Ekonomist” [A cognitive-pragmatic description of ‘international conflict’ event modelling — a case study of the 2016–2017 Mosul and Aleppo liberation operations as depicted by The Economist] /A.S. Zarochentseva, D.N. Novikov. In: Magiia INNO [The Magic of Innovation: New Dimensions in Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching]: Collection of research papers. In 2 volumes. V. 1. Moscow: MGIMO University, 2017. pp. 231–237.
4. Novikov D.N. O predelakh semanticheskogo var’irovaniia slova [On the Scope of Word Meaning Variation]. In: Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO [Philological Sciences in MGIMO]. Moscow, 2005. № 21. pp. 41–53.
5. Svirkovskaia S.V. Ksenofobicheskii diskurs (lingvopragmaticheskii aspect) [Xenophobic discourse (linguopragmatic aspect)]. Abstract of the thesis for PhD in Philological sciences. Krasnodar, 2005. 36 pp.
6. Tymbay A.A. Manipulirovanie sobesednikom v politicheskom dialoge [Manipulating a partner in a political dialogue]. In: Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO [Philological Sciences in MGIMO]. Moscow, 2019. № 19(3). pp. 32–39.
7. Fomina T.A. Manipuliativnye priemy dezinformatsii kak sredstvo realizatsii antirossiiskoi propagandy v zagolovkakh angloyazychnykh SMI (na primere osveshheniia «dela Skripalei» v period s marta po oktiabr` 2018 goda) [Manipulation techniques of disseminating misinformation as a means of generating anti-Russian propaganda in the English language media headlines: a case study of the 2018 Salisbury attack as depicted in the English-language news stories] / T.A. Fomina, E.D. Butsyk, In: Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO [Philological Sciences in MGIMO]. Moscow, 2019. № 19(3). pp. 50–58.
8. Sheigal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philology. Volgograd, 2000. 431 pp.
9. 16,000 READERS SHARED THEIR EXPERIENCES OF BEING TOLD TO ‘GO BACK.’ HERE ARE SOME OF THEIR STORIES. In: The New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2019/07/19/reader-center/trump-go-back-stories.html (accessed 19 July 2019).
10. Allan K. Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language. / K. Allan, K. Burridge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 303 pp.
11. Cambridge Dictionary, dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/ (accessed 1 November 2019).
12. CHINA FIGHTS NEW WAVE OF BIRD-FLU VIRUS AS DOZENS DIE. In: The Seattle Times, www.seattletimes.com/nationworld/china-fights-new-wave-of-bird-flu-virus-as-dozens-die/ (accessed 18 February 2017).
13. GREAT LOCAL CHINKY, www.tripadvisor.com.au/ShowUserReviews-g4132315-d724921-r639806267 Fu_Kwai_Chinese_ Restaurant-Frenchs_Forest_Warringah_Greater_Sydney_New_South_Wal.html#) (accessed 28 October 2019).
14. Kröll H. O eufemismo e o disfemismo no português moderno. Lisbon: Instituto de Cultura e Língua Portuguesa, 1984. 170 pp.
15. NATIVE AMERICAN LEADERS ASK TRUMP TO APOLOGIZE FOR ‘SHAMEFUL’ WOUNDED KNEE REMARKS. In: ABC News, abcnews.go.com/Politics/native-american-leaders-trump-apologize-shameful-wounded-knee/story?id=60374772 2019 (accessed 14 January 2019).
16. Online Etymology Dictionary, www.etymonline.com/ (accessed 1 November 2019).
17. Oxford Dictionary, en.oxforddictionaries.com/ (accessed 1 November 2019).
18. SYRIA: DONALD TRUMP SAYS SLAUGHTER IN IDLIB WOULD MAKE US ‘VERY ANGRY’. In: The Guardian, www. theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/05/syria-donald-trump-idlib-slaughter-very-angry (accessed 5 September 2018).
19. Urban Dictionary, www.urbandictionary.com/ (accessed 1 November 2019).
20. Von Foerster H. Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. New York: Springer, 2003. P. 201.
Review
For citations:
Fomina T.A., Alieva T.V. X-PHEMISMS AS NON-LINEAR PHENOMENA. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2020;22(2):22-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2020-2-22-53
Views:
709
Email this article 